From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02CBC18AF5 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35D85C433C8; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:04:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689267842; bh=L/hiCcnT7c1qI3+L7nQcuycK9uSve3ePnEWo922QO9M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=l0nJBsgcPEGayeFtulD6OxTY6kMZkH9S6ClszKZ2JkxFaA73WPRZCTEkJYSmj968E pZ+0PWH2Dn7d3MiU7HX6BoX0P0X0q3LyG0Pw0OcATjbTjNvxA0XYphjlKVY/EPYXXO xkVlsK5UTDAFiPTU7IRjOe3ThRM9+G+2I9sYgXGCHhkF+ls8Cs2ZecmKcKvWq6R9VV 6AFBPKtrSLSU+7he9SX2/1ErkrGwTJRmRSY9tZoAhgRbqkSH4D2qXxaKxKz/MVXhvB mTArvVISPXkCHrubzHKvJJDcgZGTw+Vm94Byzwb7hAcEP+csLA4ASPoYUakTNQfVLt XDTp4SC0Z1NVw== Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 10:04:01 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Jianbo Liu , Eric Dumazet , Mark Bloch , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , "David S . Miller" , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/12] net/mlx5: Compare with old_dest param to modify rule destination Message-ID: <20230713100401.5fe0fa77@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230713063345.GG41919@unreal> References: <5fd15672173653d6904333ef197b605b0644e205.1689064922.git.leonro@nvidia.com> <20230712173259.4756fe08@kernel.org> <20230713063345.GG41919@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:33:45 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > This says Fixes, should I quickly toss it into net so it makes > > tomorrow's PR? > > This is a fix, but it useful for this series only, which actually > needs to modify flow steering rule destinations on the fly. > > There is no other code in mlx5 which needs this fix. Reads like "can't be triggered with current code", in which case the right thing to do is to add "can't be triggered with current code" to the commit message, rather than the Fixes tag. I had a look thru the series yesterday, and it looks good to me (tho I'm no ipsec expert). Thanks for putting in the work! Could you add some info about how the code in the series can be exercised / example configurations? And please CC Simon, it'd be great to get him / someone at Corigine to review. And obviously Steffen, why did you not CC Steffen?! :o