From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/12] net/mlx5: Compare with old_dest param to modify rule destination
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:05:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230713110556.682d21ba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230713174317.GH41919@unreal>
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 20:43:17 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Reads like "can't be triggered with current code", in which case
> > the right thing to do is to add "can't be triggered with current
> > code" to the commit message, rather than the Fixes tag.
>
> The code is wrong, so comes Fixes line, but I can remove it.
Yes, perhaps after death we will inhabit a world with clear,
non-conflicting rules, where law can be followed to the letter
and "truth" and "good" are clearly and objectively defined.
Until the sweat release, tho, let's apply common sense, and
not add Fixes tags to patches which can't possibly be of interest
to backporters.
Please and thank you...
> > I had a look thru the series yesterday, and it looks good to me
> > (tho I'm no ipsec expert). Thanks for putting in the work!
> >
> > Could you add some info about how the code in the series can be
> > exercised / example configurations? And please CC Simon, it'd be
> > great to get him / someone at Corigine to review.
> >
> > And obviously Steffen, why did you not CC Steffen?! :o
>
> It works exactly like "regular" IPsec, nothing special, except
> now users can switch to switchdev before adding IPsec rules.
>
> devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:06:00.0 mode switchdev
>
> Same configurations as here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1670005543.git.leonro@nvidia.com/
> Packet offload mode:
> ip xfrm state offload packet dev <if-name> dir <in|out>
> ip xfrm policy .... offload packet dev <if-name>
> Crypto offload mode:
> ip xfrm state offload crypto dev <if-name> dir <in|out>
> or (backward compatibility)
> ip xfrm state offload dev <if-name> dir <in|out>
I see, so all policy based IPsec?
Does the order of processing in the device match the kernel?
TC packet rewrites or IPsec comes first?
> I didn't add Steffen as it is more flow steering magic series
> and not IPsec :).
>
> I'll resubmit on Sunday.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-13 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 9:28 [PATCH net-next 00/12] mlx5 IPsec packet offload support in eswitch mode Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:28 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] net/mlx5e: Add function to get IPsec offload namespace Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] net/mlx5e: Change the parameter of IPsec RX skb handle function Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] net/mlx5e: Prepare IPsec packet offload for switchdev mode Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] net/mlx5e: Refactor IPsec RX tables creation and destruction Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] net/mlx5e: Support IPsec packet offload for RX in switchdev mode Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] net/mlx5e: Handle IPsec offload for RX datapath " Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] net/mlx5e: Refactor IPsec TX tables creation Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] net/mlx5e: Support IPsec packet offload for TX in switchdev mode Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] net/mlx5: Compare with old_dest param to modify rule destination Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-13 0:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-13 6:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-13 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-13 17:43 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-13 18:05 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-07-13 18:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-14 3:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-14 18:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-14 19:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-14 20:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-15 3:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-16 10:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-19 9:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] net/mlx5e: Make IPsec offload work together with eswitch and TC Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] net/mlx5e: Modify and restore TC rules for IPSec TX rules Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-11 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] net/mlx5e: Add get IPsec offload stats for uplink representor Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230713110556.682d21ba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).