From: Matthew House <mattlloydhouse@gmail.com>
To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] recv.2: Document MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC as returned in msg_flags
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:26:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230718172648.943269-1-mattlloydhouse@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05f6395d-4ee2-ce87-253a-9dcbfe227d42@kernel.org>
Ever since commit 4a19542e5f69 ("O_CLOEXEC for SCM_RIGHTS") added the
MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC flag to recvmsg(2), the flag has also been copied into the
returned msg->msg_flags when specified, regardless of whether any file
descriptors were actually received, or whether the protocol supports
receiving file descriptors at all. This behavior was primarily an
implementation artifact: by copying MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC into the msg_flags,
scm_detach_fds() in net/core/scm.c (and its _compat() counterpart in
net/compat.c) could determine whether it was set without having to receive
a copy of the recvmsg(2) flags.
This mechanism was closely modeled after the internal MSG_CMSG_COMPAT flag,
which is passed by the compat versions of the send[m]msg(2) and
recv[m]msg(2) syscalls to inform various functions that user space expects
a compat layout. When the flag was first implemented by commits
3225fc8a85f4 ("[NET]: Simplify scm handling and sendmsg/recvmsg invocation,
consolidate net compat syscalls.") and 7e8d06bc1d90 ("[COMPAT]: Fix
MSG_CMSG_COMPAT flag passing, kill cmsg_compat_recvmsg_fixup.") (in
history/history.git), the behavior was very similar: recvmsg(2) would add
MSG_CMSG_COMPAT to the msg_flags, and put_cmsg() and scm_detach_fds() in
net/core/scm.c would read the flag to determine whether to delegate to
their _compat() counterparts.
However, after the initial implementation, more work was done to hide
MSG_CMSG_COMPAT from user space. First, commit 37f7f421cce1 ("[NET]: Do not
leak MSG_CMSG_COMPAT into userspace.") started scrubbing the bit from
msg_flags right before copying it back into user space. Then, since passing
the MSG_CMSG_COMPAT flag into the syscalls from non-compat code could
confuse the kernel, commits 1be374a0518a ("net: Block MSG_CMSG_COMPAT in
send(m)msg and recv(m)msg") and a7526eb5d06b ("net: Unbreak
compat_sys_{send,recv}msg") made them return -EINVAL if user space
attempted to pass the flag. But to reduce breakage, commit d720d8cec563
("net: compat: Ignore MSG_CMSG_COMPAT in compat_sys_{send, recv}msg")
rolled that back somewhat, making MSG_CMSG_COMPAT an error for the
non-compat syscalls and a no-op for the compat syscalls, which is the
current status quo.
Even though MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC was implemented after the kernel started
scrubbing MSG_CMSG_COMPAT from the returned msg_flags, the newer flag never
received the same treatment. At this point, this behavior has effectively
become part of the user-space API, to the extent that io_uring has been
careful in commit 9bb66906f23e ("io_uring: support multishot in recvmsg")
to replicate the behavior in its multishot IORING_OP_RECVMSG operation.
Therefore, document this behavior to avoid confusion when user space sees
MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC returned in msg->msg_flags.
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthew House <mattlloydhouse@gmail.com>
---
Alright, I've summarized the history in the commit message, and I've added
the CCs you requested.
Also, for future reference, Drepper gave a reply to the last email, which
did not make it onto the list:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 9:24 AM Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 2:10 PM Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > As for the original
> > > purpose of the behavior, it's not really clear, and it may well have been
> > > an implementation artifact that got enshrined in the user space ABI.
> > (Even
> > > io_uring is careful to replicate this behavior!)
> >
> > This is what worries me. I've CCd a bunch of people to see if they can
> > bring some light.
> >
>
> It definitely was an artifact of the implementation. I haven't tested
> getting the close-on-exec flag information for all interfaces. The
> assumption was that the information about the close-on-exec flag is
> received with the universal fcntl() call.
Thank you,
Matthew House
man2/recv.2 | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man2/recv.2 b/man2/recv.2
index 660c103fb..1cd9f3e1b 100644
--- a/man2/recv.2
+++ b/man2/recv.2
@@ -412,6 +412,15 @@ is returned to indicate that expedited or out-of-band data was received.
.B MSG_ERRQUEUE
indicates that no data was received but an extended error from the socket
error queue.
+.TP
+.BR MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC " (since Linux 2.6.23)"
+.\" commit 4a19542e5f694cd408a32c3d9dc593ba9366e2d7
+indicates that
+.B MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC
+was specified in the
+.I flags
+argument of
+.BR recvmsg ().
.SH RETURN VALUE
These calls return the number of bytes received, or \-1
if an error occurred.
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-18 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230709213358.389871-1-mattlloydhouse@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <363c0f82-969d-1927-1bd5-b664cfc83a87@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20230716234803.851580-1-mattlloydhouse@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20230718060121.934187-1-mattlloydhouse@gmail.com>
2023-07-18 12:03 ` [PATCH v2] recv.2: Document MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC as returned in msg_flags Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-18 17:26 ` Matthew House [this message]
2023-07-18 21:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230718172648.943269-1-mattlloydhouse@gmail.com \
--to=mattlloydhouse@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).