From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BA317480 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 01:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 981A6C433C7; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 01:45:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689990319; bh=xWFlk0dYt7/YNjb3bVEqK50P29rrnkR0ycCLP2RQkFA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UXT4QB21VXHPsgb5gMo1lbluzaifEtZo+gpjqSvukz2O7BzC2SR3P9UxjEZEWt4Yv 3tPER4/XcA7YQ1PXft2o80+BBPFVQ19QIHRxojV5p5hFerjpye3OI3gVI04A4czHUh GiaP7ApqiebcfdwbGpuHVdpJZtw2DSJRZ0AoDba4V9gErzPrqxkbeIgwMfzkDzeMAW F7J8kO6B32M/VzcMddqBRct6R9o0Prv51vRU2I/KnMJ8V8U1ZO3eJcr+EFmtmrzNAp pPUIAOpPLw8kkJdFmPZPROYWg6DAH8qSWfFiXfb/0+7LDne5VzBSgkj0skTYevkkla dXw8WXzqBNArw== Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:45:17 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] page_pool: add a lockdep check for recycling in hardirq Message-ID: <20230721184517.11003011@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230720173752.2038136-1-kuba@kernel.org> <4abeeded-536e-be28-5409-8ad502674217@intel.com> <20230721090538.57cfd15d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:33:39 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > No strong preference. Would you mind taking over this one? > > It'd also benefit from testing that the lockdep warning actually > > fires as expected, I just tested that it doesn't false positive TBH :) > > Sure! I'll add it to the optimization series as a pre-req to more > aggressive direct recycling, would that be fine? SG! -- pw-bot: cr