From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
mkubecek@suse.cz, lorenzo@kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: store netdevs in an xarray
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:41:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230724084126.38d55715@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20788d4df9bbcdce9453be3fd047fdf8e0465714.camel@redhat.com>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:18:04 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> A possibly dumb question: why using an xarray over a plain list?
We need to drop the lock during the walk. So for a list we'd need
to either
- add explicit iteration "cursor" or
- suffer O(n) for insertion + O(n^2) for restart?
Or there's a easier way to do it?
The cursor is not the worst option, I guess, a bit less intuitive
and harder to clean up on error, but doable?
> It looks like the idea is to additionally use xarray for device lookup
> beyond for dumping?
I was measuring it to find out if we can delete the hash table without
anyone noticing, but it's not really the motivation.
> WRT the above, have you considered instead replacing dev_name_head with
> an rhashtable? (and add the mentioned list)
The main motivation is ease of iteration for netlink dumps.
I'll admit that my understanding of rhashtable is superficial but
I don't think it's possible to do consistent dumps with it. Even
if it supported "cursors" (which I'm not sure it does) a rhash could
rearrange buckets and mess the order up. The comment on
rhltable_walk_enter() says:
* For a completely stable walk you should construct your own data
* structure outside the hash table.
Given the iteration process is controlled by user space trying to
constrain a rhash also used by the fast path to get consistent dumps
seems risky.
Adding Herbert and Neil to keep me honest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-24 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-22 1:42 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: store netdevs in an xarray Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-22 1:42 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-22 1:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-24 8:18 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-07-24 15:41 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-07-24 16:23 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-07-24 17:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-24 19:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-25 11:11 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-07-25 16:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-25 17:54 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2023-07-25 19:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-24 19:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-07-22 1:42 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: convert some netlink netdev iterators to depend on the xarray Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-24 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: store netdevs in an xarray Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230724084126.38d55715@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).