From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EEFE100CE for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 19:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAA18C433C7; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 19:35:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1690227348; bh=+3SNOt1+WZwJata7+r2bIJ7TFCvk4aRi9FuKIxNSs58=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f/f7ORKUlKe81g7fI716ruYhgDBzhpBjZilLIqEUDahKxfHcQneQp6a5IoB0HMYAt WxdZI1sNJZU7LJ6WLc+P7eGIUHJp+Clf+KGZAhcmKGkg/j7L8zyTJAy2A873bSOIgf /XNiQiNpR1HCZKP5+R57LgYzAZo4Q9BnVNROa6OXzfbhBuBDGfdvluVV7NL0hMrzar WEYmLDqJ/zj/mf+3J+AWj6K/PrJBjnaLEi0Z3+6HKzw/5LFsxoiUSk4py2F/5re29j GdBo+d3QbiXgBIbN4BeyOD8pNhyomD+LENIA/iN+1RDhjcc+e1SdKouVfPh4vVfg5a wWdX4f87RzhpA== Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:35:46 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Message-ID: <20230724123546.70775e77@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <9f37941c-b265-7f28-ebec-76c04804b684@grimberg.me> References: <20230721143523.56906-1-hare@suse.de> <20230721190026.25d2f0a5@kernel.org> <3e83c1dd-99bd-4dbd-2f83-4008e7059cfa@suse.de> <9f37941c-b265-7f28-ebec-76c04804b684@grimberg.me> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:21:52 +0300 Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski > >> > >> Sagi, I _think_ a stable branch with this should be doable, > >> would you like one, or no rush? > > > > I guess a stable branch would not be too bad; I've got another > > set of patches for the NVMe side, too. > > Sagi? > > I don't think there is a real need for this to go to stable, nothing > is using it. Perhaps the MSG_EOR patches can go to stable in case > there is some userspace code that wants to rely on it. I'm probably using the wrong word. I mean a branch based on -rc3 that's not going to get rebased so the commits IDs match and we can both pull it in. Not stable as in Greg KH.