From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB290EDC for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 20:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5853F422B for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-76595a7b111so197498285a.2 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:29:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; t=1690576162; x=1691180962; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=eMyiYSraWOsfgY7mYokHSSuNHn+kD9GoiXATa0bMhbA=; b=CyBzgfMVag2WTWwhwboVgeQuGJ8BrCm87IB6j9uR6o6bep1JkWYRgrEgDybWowy+kJ YqNGl2ezH5o2/HFJPLiJ7Owzdi28zy+HpYhNpsVVxYi5pj9pTA0Yuv9d1vkm3rwLWYPm tvqU7DbjNhxOp4sXeS2yP2ybAXRqtiW0dZiN8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690576162; x=1691180962; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=eMyiYSraWOsfgY7mYokHSSuNHn+kD9GoiXATa0bMhbA=; b=gV4+PEV3udbtTk+EA1hIB4eWAIyoNSnIEGn+Ctg5dyJYzAref8xixGjO5YKNsnlEyq xsGKxzFTfXMpjEESXbOsvjw2HcA9ah3G8CX5X9+KupeodAN+NHC/6+3J175tJ6zsrsFk xYu7I+6Tfd6fU+DOcB4dM0AlOHaRjARwlNN7RGFjWjHax2wy/54x/Yu+SIi0+aLm7XXW mx5uJPJU6DDjnV84Y3DPxKEaIAbvFcTFg+aY8Q9CoprDv4+MVdAziAab4t24AFYhcJrs iIo1l2f3163ZE4vKdDqhj50Rf19mq6lL9mhpp2VeN46pLpRL49poKZOZEbynJGIkGTJj K3Fw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLb0L8cnwlBXMyEqqYD9ZeoJt+z0b7wYCAi2xodoSDf+i7BY2CJz w6+l63r4rjQg6JMwzpaN+OSELg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEH8lk5dwyzE/DgADvnA4XqnbUm4KS8L0cE5+GCBLvF3aA9Fy8KrmFx861A+YXH+5lm8F2GOw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2ac5:b0:767:117c:f57b with SMTP id bn5-20020a05620a2ac500b00767117cf57bmr4052291qkb.8.1690576162510; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meerkat.local ([142.113.79.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7-20020a05620a15a700b007682634ac20sm1372246qkk.115.2023.07.28.13.29.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:29:13 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Linus Torvalds , Joe Perches , Krzysztof Kozlowski , geert@linux-m68k.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, mario.limonciello@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: get_maintainer: steer people away from using file paths Message-ID: <20230728-egotism-icing-3d0bd0@meerkat> References: <20230726130318.099f96fc@kernel.org> <20230726133648.54277d76@kernel.org> <20230726145721.52a20cb7@kernel.org> <20230726-june-mocha-ad6809@meerkat> <20230726171123.0d573f7c@kernel.org> <20230726-armless-ungodly-a3242f@meerkat> <1b96e465-0922-4c02-b770-4b1f27bebeb8@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1b96e465-0922-4c02-b770-4b1f27bebeb8@lunn.ch> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 01:00:15PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Think as if instead of being Cc'd on patches, they got Bcc'd on them. > > And how does reply work? I assume it would only go to those in To: or > Cc: ? Is there enough context in the headers in a reply for the system > to figure out who to Bcc: the reply to? I have actually solved a similar problem already as part of a different project (bugbot). We associate a set of additional addresses with a thread and can send any thread updates to those addresses. It would require a bit more effort to adapt it so we properly handle bounces, but effectively this does what you're asking about -- replies sent to a thread will be sent out to all addresses we've associated with that thread (via get_maintainer.pl). In a sense, this will create a miniature pseudo-mailing list per each thread with its own set of subscribers. I just need to make sure this doesn't fall over once we are hitting LKML-levels of activity. -K