From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] virtchnl: fix fake 1-elem arrays in structs allocated as `nents + 1` - 1
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:43:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202307281537.AC1ED9CA@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728155207.10042-2-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 05:52:05PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> The two most problematic virtchnl structures are virtchnl_rss_key and
> virtchnl_rss_lut. Their "flex" arrays have the type of u8, thus, when
> allocating / checking, the actual size is calculated as `sizeof +
> nents - 1 byte`. But their sizeof() is not 1 byte larger than the size
> of such structure with proper flex array, it's two bytes larger due to
> the padding. That said, their size is always 1 byte larger unless
> there are no tail elements -- then it's +2 bytes.
> Add virtchnl_struct_size() macro which will handle this case (and later
> other cases as well). Make its calling conv the same as we call
> struct_size() to allow it to be drop-in, even though it's unlikely to
> become possible to switch to generic API. The macro will calculate a
> proper size of a structure with a flex array at the end, so that it
> becomes transparent for the compilers, but add the difference from the
> old values, so that the real size of sorta-ABI-messages doesn't change.
> Use it on the allocation side in IAVF and the receiving side (defined
> as static inline in virtchnl.h) for the mentioned two structures.
This all looks workable, but it's a unique solution in the kernel. That
is fine, of course, but would it be easier to maintain/test if it went
with the union style solutions?
struct foo {
...
union {
type legacy_padding;
DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(type, member);
};
};
Then the size doesn't change and "member" can still be used. (i.e. no
collateral changes needed.)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-28 15:52 [PATCH net-next 0/3] virtchnl: fix fake 1-elem arrays Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-28 15:52 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] virtchnl: fix fake 1-elem arrays in structs allocated as `nents + 1` - 1 Alexander Lobakin
2023-07-28 22:43 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-08-01 13:08 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 8:27 ` Kees Cook
2023-08-04 15:42 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 17:29 ` Kees Cook
2023-08-04 17:33 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-16 12:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Romanowski, Rafal
2023-07-28 15:52 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] virtchnl: fix fake 1-elem arrays in structures allocated as `nents + 1` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 8:29 ` Kees Cook
2023-08-16 12:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Romanowski, Rafal
2023-07-28 15:52 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] virtchnl: fix fake 1-elem arrays for structures allocated as `nents` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 8:30 ` Kees Cook
2023-08-16 12:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Romanowski, Rafal
2023-08-03 15:55 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] virtchnl: fix fake 1-elem arrays Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 16:38 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-04 18:07 ` Tony Nguyen
2023-08-04 18:09 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-08-16 12:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Romanowski, Rafal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-16 21:06 [PATCH net-next 0/3][pull request] " Tony Nguyen
2023-08-16 21:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] virtchnl: fix fake 1-elem arrays in structs allocated as `nents + 1` - 1 Tony Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202307281537.AC1ED9CA@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).