From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: Use sockaddr_storage for getsockopt(SO_PEERNAME).
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:48:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230729004813.41405-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
Commit df8fc4e934c1 ("kbuild: Enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3") started
applying strict rules to standard string functions.
It does not work well with conventional socket code around each protocol-
specific sockaddr_XXX struct, which is cast from sockaddr_storage and has
a bigger size than fortified functions expect. See these commits:
commit 06d4c8a80836 ("af_unix: Fix fortify_panic() in unix_bind_bsd().")
commit ecb4534b6a1c ("af_unix: Terminate sun_path when bind()ing pathname socket.")
commit a0ade8404c3b ("af_packet: Fix warning of fortified memcpy() in packet_getname().")
We must cast the protocol-specific address back to sockaddr_storage
to call such functions.
However, in the case of getsockaddr(SO_PEERNAME), the rationale is a bit
unclear as the buffer is defined by char[128] which is the same size as
sockaddr_storage.
Let's use sockaddr_storage explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
---
v2:
* Add Reviewed-by
* s/implicitly/explicitly/ in changelog
* Replace Link with commits
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230720005456.88770-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
---
net/core/sock.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index ab1e8d1bd5a1..4ad267ba0099 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1806,14 +1806,14 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
case SO_PEERNAME:
{
- char address[128];
+ struct sockaddr_storage address;
- lv = sock->ops->getname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)address, 2);
+ lv = sock->ops->getname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&address, 2);
if (lv < 0)
return -ENOTCONN;
if (lv < len)
return -EINVAL;
- if (copy_to_sockptr(optval, address, len))
+ if (copy_to_sockptr(optval, &address, len))
return -EFAULT;
goto lenout;
}
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-29 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-29 0:48 Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2023-07-31 8:20 ` [PATCH v2 net-next] net: Use sockaddr_storage for getsockopt(SO_PEERNAME) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230729004813.41405-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).