From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D195C4DC9B; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E74BC433C8; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:53:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1690908802; bh=BkWqBhDYPEqAwt1g3ViRliirqnUaKD5LRWPIiBLWGmg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AQimNDN+S32Wcs+ioSSsu/LymACiSkIideOqRPDur3eTHop/2vD0Mgytks+WcY8Dt UdUqV1AWPD6OFJspWg6kPgvEJ6MWKvsZrwB5zPAqpYTpSgzJoBBqBO7/yjsWGhHPAS o7z0M+SPzipXGdMZd97uCbEK68sz208wegcbI4aRGevRoxCnMhLESGc3pte3xv0mGI NK0BXAhC0x9R9drqlakeTNtKaW+uqFh7u/uJHN7DwRINECXGyoH8ItUKVA9BBq5wQT cEvs5doKEWYtefs8ObDtZqu2TLvcnVuACHXa7PTpKe8JsdfkG2hM/b6I3SuESW3Qz5 bijvXc4Tdwfbw== Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:53:21 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: kernel test robot , , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , loongarch@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [alobakin:iavf-pp-frag 11/28] net/core/page_pool.c:582:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) Message-ID: <20230801095321.3ce734c1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <217dc739-05f5-a708-d358-ba331325d0cd@intel.com> References: <202307292029.cFz0s8Hh-lkp@intel.com> <217dc739-05f5-a708-d358-ba331325d0cd@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 15:46:22 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307292029.cFz0s8Hh-lkp@intel.com/ > > Jakub, could you take a look, is this warning reasonable? Doesn't look legit to me. I can't repro it on x86 and: $ head .config # # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT. # Linux/loongarch 6.5.0-rc3 Kernel Configuration # CONFIG_CC_VERSION_TEXT="loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0" Adding loongarch to CC, it must be arch specific ?