netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	hawk@kernel.org, jbrouer@redhat.com, dsahern@gmail.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	syzbot+f817490f5bd20541b90a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] drivers: net: prevent tun_build_skb() to exceed the packet size limit
Date: Thu,  3 Aug 2023 20:59:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230803185947.2379988-1-andrew.kanner@gmail.com> (raw)

Using the syzkaller repro with reduced packet size it was discovered
that XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM is not checked in tun_can_build_skb(),
although pad may be incremented in tun_build_skb(). This may end up
with exceeding the PAGE_SIZE limit in tun_build_skb().

Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> proposed to count XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM
always (e.g. without rcu_access_pointer(tun->xdp_prog)) in
tun_can_build_skb() since there's a window during which XDP program
might be attached between tun_can_build_skb() and tun_build_skb().

Fixes: 7df13219d757 ("tun: reserve extra headroom only when XDP is set")
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f817490f5bd20541b90a
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@gmail.com>
---

Notes (akanner):
    v5:
      - always count XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM in tun_can_build_skb() as there's a
        window between tun_can_build_skb() and tun_build_skb() and XDP
        program might be attached there.
      - rcu_read_lock/unlock() for tun->xdp_prog were completely removed and
        there's no need to use rcu_access_pointer() instead which was noted
        by David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>.
    v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230801220710.464-1-andrew.kanner@gmail.com/T/
      - fall back to v1, fixing only missing XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM in pad
        and removing bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() check for frame_sz.
      - added rcu read lock, noted by Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> in
        v1
      - I decided to leave the packet length check in tun_can_build_skb()
        instead of moving to tun_build_skb() suggested by Jason Wang
        <jasowang@redhat.com>. Otherwise extra packets will be dropped
        without falling back to tun_alloc_skb(). And in the discussion of
        v3 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> noticed that XDP is
        ok with a higher order pages if it's a contiguous physical memory
        allocation, so falling to tun_alloc_skb() -> do_xdp_generic()
        should be ok.
    v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230725155403.796-1-andrew.kanner@gmail.com/T/
      - attach the forgotten changelog
    v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230725153941.653-1-andrew.kanner@gmail.com/T/
      - merged 2 patches in 1, fixing both issues: WARN_ON_ONCE with
        syzkaller repro and missing XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM in pad
      - changed the title and description of the execution path, suggested
        by Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
      - move the limit check from tun_can_build_skb() to tun_build_skb()
        to remove duplication and locking issue, and also drop the packet
        in case of a failed check - noted by Jason Wang
        <jasowang@redhat.com>
    v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230724221326.384-1-andrew.kanner@gmail.com/T/

 drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 25f0191df00b..100339bc8b04 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ static bool tun_can_build_skb(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
 	if (zerocopy)
 		return false;
 
-	if (SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len + TUN_RX_PAD) +
+	if (SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len + TUN_RX_PAD + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM) +
 	    SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) > PAGE_SIZE)
 		return false;
 
-- 
2.39.3


             reply	other threads:[~2023-08-03 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-03 18:59 Andrew Kanner [this message]
2023-08-03 19:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: core: remove unnecessary frame_sz check in bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() Andrew Kanner
2023-08-08  2:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] drivers: net: prevent tun_build_skb() to exceed the packet size limit patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230803185947.2379988-1-andrew.kanner@gmail.com \
    --to=andrew.kanner@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzbot+f817490f5bd20541b90a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).