netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
Cc: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: Error 'netif_napi_add_weight() called with weight 256'
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:37:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807093727.5249f517@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8fcbab1aa2e14262bea79222bf7a4976@realtek.com>

On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:57:15 +0000 Hayes Wang wrote:
> > Perhaps Hayes Wang can comment on this (as the author of 195aae321c82).  
> 
> I test our devices on an Embedded system.
> We find the throughput is low.
> And it is caused by the weight.
> Our NAPI function often uses the whole budget.
> Finally, we increase the weight, and the throughput is good.

Could it possibly be related to handling of aggregation?
Problem must lay somewhere in USB specifics, since as I said
there are 100Gbps devices running fine with budget of 64.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-31 16:02 Error 'netif_napi_add_weight() called with weight 256' Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 18:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-31 18:23   ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-31 20:47     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-07  9:57     ` Hayes Wang
2023-08-07 16:37       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-08-09 13:11         ` Hayes Wang
2023-08-09 18:37           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-14  7:07             ` Hayes Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230807093727.5249f517@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hayeswang@realtek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).