From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Cc: tariqt@nvidia.com, yishaih@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
jgg@ziepe.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/10] mlx4: Move the bond work to the core driver
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 21:56:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230808185644.GJ94631@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230804150527.6117-6-petr.pavlu@suse.com>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 05:05:22PM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> Function mlx4_en_queue_bond_work() is used in mlx4_en to start a bond
> reconfiguration. It gathers data about a new port map setting, takes
> a reference on the netdev that triggered the change and queues a work
> object on mlx4_en_priv.mdev.workqueue to perform the operation. The
> scheduled work is mlx4_en_bond_work() which calls
> mlx4_bond()/mlx4_unbond() and consequently mlx4_do_bond().
>
> At the same time, function mlx4_change_port_types() in mlx4_core might
> be invoked to change the port type configuration. As part of its logic,
> it re-registers the whole device by calling mlx4_unregister_device(),
> followed by mlx4_register_device().
>
> The two operations can result in concurrent access to the data about
> currently active interfaces on the device.
>
> Functions mlx4_register_device() and mlx4_unregister_device() lock the
> intf_mutex to gain exclusive access to this data. The current
> implementation of mlx4_do_bond() doesn't do that which could result in
> an unexpected behavior. An updated version of mlx4_do_bond() for use
> with an auxiliary bus goes and locks the intf_mutex when accessing a new
> auxiliary device array.
>
> However, doing so can then result in the following deadlock:
> * A two-port mlx4 device is configured as an Ethernet bond.
> * One of the ports is changed from eth to ib, for instance, by writing
> into a mlx4_port<x> sysfs attribute file.
> * mlx4_change_port_types() is called to update port types. It invokes
> mlx4_unregister_device() to unregister the device which locks the
> intf_mutex and starts removing all associated interfaces.
> * Function mlx4_en_remove() gets invoked and starts destroying its first
> netdev. This triggers mlx4_en_netdev_event() which recognizes that the
> configured bond is broken. It runs mlx4_en_queue_bond_work() which
> takes a reference on the netdev. Removing the netdev now cannot
> proceed until the work is completed.
> * Work function mlx4_en_bond_work() gets scheduled. It calls
> mlx4_unbond() -> mlx4_do_bond(). The latter function tries to lock the
> intf_mutex but that is not possible because it is held already by
> mlx4_unregister_device().
>
> This particular case could be possibly solved by unregistering the
> mlx4_en_netdev_event() notifier in mlx4_en_remove() earlier, but it
> seems better to decouple mlx4_en more and break this reference order.
>
> Avoid then this scenario by recognizing that the bond reconfiguration
> operates only on a mlx4_dev. The logic to queue and execute the bond
> work can be moved into the mlx4_core driver. Only a reference on the
> respective mlx4_dev object is needed to be taken during the work's
> lifetime. This removes a call from mlx4_en that can directly result in
> needing to lock the intf_mutex, it remains a privilege of the core
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
> Tested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c | 62 +-----------------
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4.h | 5 ++
> include/linux/mlx4/device.h | 13 ++++
> include/linux/mlx4/driver.h | 19 ------
> 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 15:05 [PATCH net-next 00/10] Convert mlx4 to use auxiliary bus Petr Pavlu
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] mlx4: Get rid of the mlx4_interface.get_dev callback Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] mlx4: Rename member mlx4_en_dev.nb to netdev_nb Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] mlx4: Replace the mlx4_interface.event callback with a notifier Petr Pavlu
2023-08-05 14:29 ` Zhu Yanjun
2023-08-08 12:13 ` Petr Pavlu
2023-08-07 13:58 ` Simon Horman
2023-08-08 12:15 ` Petr Pavlu
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] mlx4: Get rid of the mlx4_interface.activate callback Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] mlx4: Move the bond work to the core driver Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:56 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] mlx4: Avoid resetting MLX4_INTFF_BONDING per driver Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] mlx4: Register mlx4 devices to an auxiliary virtual bus Petr Pavlu
2023-08-06 3:16 ` Zhu Yanjun
2023-08-08 12:17 ` Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] mlx4: Connect the ethernet part to the auxiliary bus Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] mlx4: Connect the infiniband " Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-04 15:05 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] mlx4: Delete custom device management logic Petr Pavlu
2023-08-08 18:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-04 16:49 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] Convert mlx4 to use auxiliary bus Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-09 11:12 ` Tariq Toukan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230808185644.GJ94631@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).