From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151C91E1D2 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFB52C433C7; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:26:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1691684791; bh=PLPnIFk3ITvkeqRC6SfEJPLCPJ/y0ZeEHIWOWpjo5dk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QemTnpP0JmToWpYcZxplHbiGYvfYs4gybItzpa4gzs3eNSO3s2gDEWx+arnKQPgz3 QJVZTTXuwONIoRucWygOE9x4wahbOuFqVX0mBjMb6D3rIzKqB6kg+dPL2EZH3PKRSG B+pr00mqquRjUR+sHHlgS6ravXh9nfKr5lM/ZODwCqi8bnVuQCDJNz7wUm/em+DF6b 4a2ruuvveKre6aG8bZfAPol/F0LJUHiRDnyg9aaZN//b08Lb/wbp9wkUdx/pqNSqjT Mjj+BsF5xwlS8a/+vwUGNxDweJmVN0F7AOl3lj/Me/qApLvSQSYQARM5iOyY+Gh/LN 5W+KwsBCntQCA== Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:26:29 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Ruan Jinjie Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] net: Remove redundant of_match_ptr() macro Message-ID: <20230810092629.47d47537@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230810081656.2981965-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20230810081656.2981965-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:16:51 +0800 Ruan Jinjie wrote: > Changes in v2: > - Correct the subject prefix: patch -> PATCH Cool, now Linus replies to v1 with his acks and you've wasted everyone's time. If only we didn't have rules about reposting.. oh wait: Quoting documentation: Resending after review ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Allow at least 24 hours to pass between postings. This will ensure reviewers from all geographical locations have a chance to chime in. Do not wait too long (weeks) between postings either as it will make it harder for reviewers to recall all the context. Make sure you address all the feedback in your new posting. Do not post a new version of the code if the discussion about the previous version is still ongoing, unless directly instructed by a reviewer. See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#resending-after-review I'm throwing your series out. Resend next week with all the tags included. -- pw-bot: cr