From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA1951E1C0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E73CC433C8; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:33:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1691688781; bh=w486nyzRHpAmngFJBzsm9JYDfkyohxWqFlzZ7SdQvoo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q3HhqwYvxrtiMVGJ6Qz2XBKY7M0GRY9i5LxNPqRqmzX/Y6Rm4iJZjjuEgs3JvGrsh THau7ihA1GlXKRDD7JTzzk6aNrdndmEha+LGL7RBQ5KNgNs78a4SYrtQywqwkMxd5i X0yKxaGzp+Rq5DKvXBf7dLX1PILOgXeC+G1Rh3DZmdlKgjkk/wM6Dq3/+sqNn6TXvd hFxVt+q8CJktcJ/Y9QDcv9FWRtrdUpZJ7PZ3nStkovVXA/5Lm4Vth5EWGE/p2zFE41 kZ4YAaaQzefBHsIqoZawk7QL9szGC1lzFfDTssCTGCugBSQbKqc/BfFw0GVwfE8B9W yXrxQxjbEmWHQ== Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:33:00 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Shay Drory Cc: , , , , Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] devlink: Delay health recover notification until devlink registered Message-ID: <20230810103300.186b42c8@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230809203521.1414444-1-shayd@nvidia.com> References: <20230809203521.1414444-1-shayd@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 23:35:21 +0300 Shay Drory wrote: > From one side, devl_register() is done last in device initialization > phase, in order to expose devlink to the user only when device is > ready. From second side, it is valid to create health reporters > during device initialization, in order to recover and/or notify the > user. > As a result, a health recover can be invoked before devl_register(). > However, invoking health recover before devl_register() triggers a > WARN_ON. My comment on v1 wasn't clear enough, I guess. What I was trying to get across is that because drivers can take devl_lock(), devl_register() does not have to be last. AFAIU your driver does: devlink_port_health_reporter_create() ... devlink_register() why not change it to do: devl_lock() devl_register() devl_port_health_reporter_create() ... devl_unlock() # until unlock user space can't access the instance ?