From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E41310957 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7633C433C8; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:00:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692198008; bh=zIFuavAAkrRzHP97/+EypFEFEaYwyMI665GY6yMI4Hc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XsI833QBL1DiCoS9rGj8A1KK5ljEkiOOPQOlRDcexni1sWI+j4923/ncmD/PsyJjb xXrrENoEI1BjbVsD2+vZ7WltgbL1HDnavZxD+iySM/E0ywBYpwMf1Begt+Okog8Itf /4vi00CxwGnkP0G347P24S6NNZGHWcuqcc4vt68DcJsTpHIfkvVJ77nEOioWID6zBT drLQkcmIa/RTZHdgAsOdouzz/YIDwpedSyclQ7qAZe0oxGQU92UXECEGQ22Kt7gprn BLTGKTvCLowct7OiuNuvTrbCc2OfunZUf1wRS7Vz5OZd6uQCQubDEZxoyP/PN6QcjY /A81610E7jnHw== Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 08:00:06 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Donald Hunter Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Stanislav Fomichev , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , donald.hunter@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/10] doc/netlink: Document the genetlink-legacy schema extensions Message-ID: <20230816080006.42496226@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230815194254.89570-1-donald.hunter@gmail.com> <20230815194254.89570-3-donald.hunter@gmail.com> <20230815194902.6ce9ae12@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:16:33 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote: > > Ack. As an aside, what do we mean by "kernel input policy"? > > So I've just spotted that kernel-policy is already documented in > core-api/netlink.rst and I guess I shouldn't be documenting it in the > userspace-api at all? I could add a reference to the core-api docs so > that it's easier to find the kernel side docs when reading the > userspace-api? Ah, yes, reference sounds good. But we should also add split to the doc, I only see ``global`` and ``per-op`` described?