From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACDAA375 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB48BC433C7; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:18:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692321510; bh=saAULgCa4svmukEdxg5rGyB7EbkKtlujQFyUvp+i7Vc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hE1yGyj4I+6f6vKz+CZ5h89FLu76V7zSC7yhRof7OwLqRwXhOn8aS1eBu3nWThRp4 BusfNyTPDSmsU+goK4N1xjJAhhGgdMyyXL2iH59ZchVtK1UxgzMy0d/+h9DRVwzQU2 HQSPXD9S53phggMCxQRrl0vpZnw4juwtWNmcsDDJkRys5uQx1iyJDvDcjMa3M1rF5N +8cODK2nCP6UH2hl1eakWUQ7MhNxZnJnCOpgZHM3D9bFuQ8TTbuzr+mY1Y8NadUHZB aHNgI8MpHVFoTcoQkhWNJE6GJ4YJ81frQ3ccERlnL/pqY+Fu3dMAyLCqBZ5YDkkvUS +ipsTAyj6tQdw== Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:18:28 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Donald Hunter Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Stanislav Fomichev , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , donald.hunter@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/10] tools/net/ynl: Add support for netlink-raw families Message-ID: <20230817181828.76ac2c11@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230815194254.89570-1-donald.hunter@gmail.com> <20230815194254.89570-7-donald.hunter@gmail.com> <20230816082908.1365f287@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:10:35 +0100 Donald Hunter wrote: > > Looks good, but do we also need some extra plumbing to decode extack > > for classic netlink correctly? Basically shouldn't _decode_extack() > > also move to proto? Or we can parameterize it? All we really need there > > is to teach it how much of fixed headers parser needs to skip to get to > > attributes, really (which, BTW is already kinda buggy for genl families > > with fixed headers). > > I have been working on the assumption that extack responses don't > include any fixed headers. I have seen extack messages decoded correctly > for classic netlink, here with RTM_NEWROUTE: > > lib.ynl.NlError: Netlink error: Invalid argument > nl_len = 80 (64) nl_flags = 0x300 nl_type = 2 > error: -22 extack: {'msg': 'Invalid prefix for given prefix length'} > > Is there something I am missing? I'm thinking of extack messages carrying offsets in addition to the textual error message. NLMSGERR_ATTR_OFFS or NLMSGERR_ATTR_MISS_NEST. In that case ynl will try to re-parse its own message via _decode_extack_path() to resolve from the offset to what attribute was there. See the commit message on a552bfa16: lib.ynl.NlError: Netlink error: Numerical result out of range nl_len = 108 (92) nl_flags = 0x300 nl_type = 2 error: -34 extack: {'msg': 'integer out of range',... 'bad-attr': '.ifindex'} I mean the "bad-attr" thing. I think it works out of sheer luck here, we happen to skip over the fixed header because it looks like a 0-length attribute?