From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@intel.com>,
"Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, poros <poros@redhat.com>,
mschmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:03:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230818140304.11f316c9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4657374BF0A9361647444D239B1BA@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:15:34 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
> HW agnostic tests were submitted by Michal as RFC for test framework
> with fake modules implemented here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230817152209.23868-1-michal.michalik@intel.com/#t
> We had an agreement on latest dpll-meeting that we will follow up with
> patches that would test dpll over fake modules, and we have started it.
> As there was no requests to add HW-aware tests yet, we are not ready for
> such submission yet. We could probably extended Michal's framework to
> make it possible test real HW, but Michal's patches were just submitted,
> we do expect some review/changes there, thus we could think of adding
> something simpler for now..
>
> Is simple bash script wrapping around cli.py and talking to ice dpll
> while verifying the outputs, an acceptable solution?
Okay, it is what it is, let's leave tests as follow up.
I'll reply to Michal on the RFC thread/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-11 20:03 [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/9] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 2:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/9] dpll: spec: Add Netlink spec in YAML Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 2:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-17 18:40 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-17 23:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 7:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-21 10:15 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-22 16:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 3:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 6:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 18:20 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 18:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:38 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/9] dpll: netlink: " Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 3:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 3:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 15:18 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 16:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 18:25 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/9] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/9] ice: add admin commands to access cgu configuration Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/9] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12 6:19 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 8/9] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-11 20:03 ` [PATCH net-next v4 9/9] mlx5: Implement SyncE support using DPLL infrastructure Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-12 6:22 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API Jiri Pirko
2023-08-12 11:20 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 2:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-15 11:36 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 11:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-08-15 14:32 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2023-08-15 17:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 10:15 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-08-18 21:03 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230818140304.11f316c9@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.michalik@intel.com \
--cc=milena.olech@intel.com \
--cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).