From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@marvell.com>
Cc: sgoutham@marvell.com, gakula@marvell.com, sbhatta@marvell.com,
hkelam@marvell.com, lcherian@marvell.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net PATCH V3 2/3] octeontx2-af: CN10KB: fix PFC configuration
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:16:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822071607.GJ2711035@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230821052516.398572-3-sumang@marvell.com>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:55:15AM +0530, Suman Ghosh wrote:
> From: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
>
> The previous patch which added new CN10KB RPM block support,
> has a bug due to which PFC is not getting configured properly.
> This patch fixes the same.
Hi Suman,
I think it would be useful to describe what the bug is - it seems like an
incorrect mask in some cases - and how that might affect users. Better
still would be commands for an example usage where the problem previously
manifested.
>
> Fixes: 99c969a83d82 ("octeontx2-pf: Add egress PFC support")
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rpm.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rpm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rpm.c
> index b4fcb20c3f4f..af21e2030cff 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rpm.c
> @@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ int rpm_lmac_enadis_pause_frm(void *rpmd, int lmac_id, u8 tx_pause,
>
> void rpm_lmac_pause_frm_config(void *rpmd, int lmac_id, bool enable)
> {
> + u64 cfg, pfc_class_mask_cfg;
> rpm_t *rpm = rpmd;
> - u64 cfg;
>
> /* ALL pause frames received are completely ignored */
> cfg = rpm_read(rpm, lmac_id, RPMX_MTI_MAC100X_COMMAND_CONFIG);
> @@ -380,9 +380,11 @@ void rpm_lmac_pause_frm_config(void *rpmd, int lmac_id, bool enable)
> rpm_write(rpm, 0, RPMX_CMR_CHAN_MSK_OR, ~0ULL);
>
> /* Disable all PFC classes */
> - cfg = rpm_read(rpm, lmac_id, RPMX_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL);
> + pfc_class_mask_cfg = is_dev_rpm2(rpm) ? RPM2_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL :
> + RPMX_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL;
Maybe it is overkill, but as this appears at least twice,
perhaps a helper would be appropriate.
> + cfg = rpm_read(rpm, lmac_id, pfc_class_mask_cfg);
> cfg = FIELD_SET(RPM_PFC_CLASS_MASK, 0, cfg);
> - rpm_write(rpm, lmac_id, RPMX_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL, cfg);
> + rpm_write(rpm, lmac_id, pfc_class_mask_cfg, cfg);
> }
>
> int rpm_get_rx_stats(void *rpmd, int lmac_id, int idx, u64 *rx_stat)
> @@ -605,8 +607,11 @@ int rpm_lmac_pfc_config(void *rpmd, int lmac_id, u8 tx_pause, u8 rx_pause, u16 p
> if (!is_lmac_valid(rpm, lmac_id))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + pfc_class_mask_cfg = is_dev_rpm2(rpm) ? RPM2_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL :
> + RPMX_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL;
> +
> cfg = rpm_read(rpm, lmac_id, RPMX_MTI_MAC100X_COMMAND_CONFIG);
> - class_en = rpm_read(rpm, lmac_id, RPMX_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL);
> + class_en = rpm_read(rpm, lmac_id, pfc_class_mask_cfg);
> pfc_en |= FIELD_GET(RPM_PFC_CLASS_MASK, class_en);
>
> if (rx_pause) {
> @@ -635,10 +640,6 @@ int rpm_lmac_pfc_config(void *rpmd, int lmac_id, u8 tx_pause, u8 rx_pause, u16 p
> cfg |= RPMX_MTI_MAC100X_COMMAND_CONFIG_PFC_MODE;
>
> rpm_write(rpm, lmac_id, RPMX_MTI_MAC100X_COMMAND_CONFIG, cfg);
> -
> - pfc_class_mask_cfg = is_dev_rpm2(rpm) ? RPM2_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL :
> - RPMX_CMRX_PRT_CBFC_CTL;
> -
> rpm_write(rpm, lmac_id, pfc_class_mask_cfg, class_en);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-21 5:25 [net PATCH V3 0/3] Fix PFC related issues Suman Ghosh
2023-08-21 5:25 ` [net PATCH V3 1/3] octeontx2-pf: Fix PFC TX scheduler free Suman Ghosh
2023-08-22 7:11 ` Simon Horman
2023-08-22 10:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-08-22 20:05 ` Simon Horman
2023-08-23 13:18 ` [EXT] " Suman Ghosh
2023-08-21 5:25 ` [net PATCH V3 2/3] octeontx2-af: CN10KB: fix PFC configuration Suman Ghosh
2023-08-22 7:16 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-08-22 11:12 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-08-22 20:06 ` Simon Horman
2023-08-23 13:16 ` [EXT] " Suman Ghosh
2023-08-21 5:25 ` [net PATCH V3 3/3] cteonxt2-pf: Fix backpressure config for multiple PFC priorities to work simultaneously Suman Ghosh
2023-08-22 7:17 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230822071607.GJ2711035@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=sumang@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).