netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC
@ 2023-08-21 14:19 Ido Schimmel
  2023-08-22  7:30 ` Simon Horman
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ido Schimmel @ 2023-08-21 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, razor, mlxsw, Ido Schimmel

The function is not called from an atomic context so use GFP_KERNEL
instead of GFP_ATOMIC. The allocation of the per-CPU stats is already
performed with GFP_KERNEL.

Tested using test_vxlan_vnifiltering.sh with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
index c3ff30ab782e..9c59d0bf8c3d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static struct vxlan_vni_node *vxlan_vni_alloc(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
 {
 	struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode;
 
-	vninode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vninode), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	vninode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vninode), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!vninode)
 		return NULL;
 	vninode->stats = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct vxlan_vni_stats_pcpu);
-- 
2.40.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC
  2023-08-21 14:19 [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC Ido Schimmel
@ 2023-08-22  7:30 ` Simon Horman
  2023-08-22  7:56 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2023-08-22  7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ido Schimmel; +Cc: netdev, davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, razor, mlxsw

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:19:23PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The function is not called from an atomic context so use GFP_KERNEL
> instead of GFP_ATOMIC. The allocation of the per-CPU stats is already
> performed with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> Tested using test_vxlan_vnifiltering.sh with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC
  2023-08-21 14:19 [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC Ido Schimmel
  2023-08-22  7:30 ` Simon Horman
@ 2023-08-22  7:56 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
  2023-08-22 10:12 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2023-08-22 18:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kalesh Anakkur Purayil @ 2023-08-22  7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ido Schimmel; +Cc: netdev, davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, razor, mlxsw


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1250 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 7:51 PM Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> wrote:

> The function is not called from an atomic context so use GFP_KERNEL
> instead of GFP_ATOMIC. The allocation of the per-CPU stats is already
> performed with GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Tested using test_vxlan_vnifiltering.sh with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
>

Reviewed-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> index c3ff30ab782e..9c59d0bf8c3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static struct vxlan_vni_node *vxlan_vni_alloc(struct
> vxlan_dev *vxlan,
>  {
>         struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode;
>
> -       vninode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vninode), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +       vninode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vninode), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!vninode)
>                 return NULL;
>         vninode->stats = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct
> vxlan_vni_stats_pcpu);
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Kalesh A P

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2078 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4239 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC
  2023-08-21 14:19 [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC Ido Schimmel
  2023-08-22  7:30 ` Simon Horman
  2023-08-22  7:56 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
@ 2023-08-22 10:12 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2023-08-22 18:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2023-08-22 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ido Schimmel, netdev; +Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, mlxsw

On 8/21/23 17:19, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The function is not called from an atomic context so use GFP_KERNEL
> instead of GFP_ATOMIC. The allocation of the per-CPU stats is already
> performed with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> Tested using test_vxlan_vnifiltering.sh with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> index c3ff30ab782e..9c59d0bf8c3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static struct vxlan_vni_node *vxlan_vni_alloc(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
>   {
>   	struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode;
>   
> -	vninode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vninode), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	vninode = kzalloc(sizeof(*vninode), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!vninode)
>   		return NULL;
>   	vninode->stats = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct vxlan_vni_stats_pcpu);

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC
  2023-08-21 14:19 [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC Ido Schimmel
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-22 10:12 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2023-08-22 18:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2023-08-22 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ido Schimmel; +Cc: netdev, davem, kuba, pabeni, edumazet, razor, mlxsw

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:19:23 +0300 you wrote:
> The function is not called from an atomic context so use GFP_KERNEL
> instead of GFP_ATOMIC. The allocation of the per-CPU stats is already
> performed with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> Tested using test_vxlan_vnifiltering.sh with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/63c11dc2ca8b

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-22 18:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-21 14:19 [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vnifilter: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC Ido Schimmel
2023-08-22  7:30 ` Simon Horman
2023-08-22  7:56 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2023-08-22 10:12 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-08-22 18:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).