From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E873B1D311 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5DBDC433C7; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:48:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1692719295; bh=NDGFu/pTIVIyyOPIqvM18RTysR3Zdf/N4m4xwaHNrcE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gLeBG9DXntKZLOvO19QvIy+1SRFhAT2sP7naVNH7joTxG6R8hV1xQQMamH9EkW/H2 8wAL8mYz7QNELpHfBRxZ29NhhwB/rjUo2nl1/EFYOSa+AClsRh6qnhA9K7WP6l5rcq Mkx42oIY39moynpRjwsVaO6KAZ15Zhf4KKZASHwdid0TdDL/rapY3sGYpt4SQCgqEn EPmDfurWUSt7rXcdfj6zzgmf34epT48g4qQHP6B8x2t7EIFDcZvNTACahQOwaImQpn MK0uL+q1ALtoywraGn1emwGLH99/VYk3JjZ/P6/8PJZJe9xFqYpjkDySYndd3ablpe XnRwGQ+mnPqug== Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:48:10 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Przemek Kitszel Cc: Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, Karol Kolacinski , anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/9] ice: use ice_pf_src_tmr_owned where available Message-ID: <20230822154810.GM6029@unreal> References: <20230817141746.18726-1-karol.kolacinski@intel.com> <20230817141746.18726-2-karol.kolacinski@intel.com> <20230819115249.GP22185@unreal> <20230822070211.GH2711035@kernel.org> <20230822141348.GH6029@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 04:44:29PM +0200, Przemek Kitszel wrote: > On 8/22/23 16:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 09:02:11AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:52:49PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 04:17:38PM +0200, Karol Kolacinski wrote: > > > > > The ice_pf_src_tmr_owned() macro exists to check the function capability > > > > > bit indicating if the current function owns the PTP hardware clock. > > > > > > > > This is first patch in the series, but I can't find mentioned macro. > > > > My net-next is based on 5b0a1414e0b0 ("Merge branch 'smc-features'") > > > > ➜ kernel git:(net-next) git grep ice_pf_src_tmr_owned > > > > shows nothing. > > > > > > > > On which branch is it based? > > > > > > Hi Leon, > > > > > > My assumption is that it is based on the dev-queue branch of > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tnguy/next-queue.git > > > > So should netdev readers review it or wait till Intel folks perform > > first pass on it? > > Most of the time Intel folks would be first to review, if only because of > our pre-IWL processes or pure familiarity/interest in given piece. > > For this particular series, it is about right "codewise" since v1, so you > are welcome for an insightful look at v3 > (I didn't provided my RBs so far because of "metadata" issues :), > will take a fresh look, but you don't need to wait). > > > General idea for CC'ing netdev for IWL-targeted patches is to have open > develompent process. > Quality should be already as for netdev posting. > Our VAL picks up patches for testing from here when Tony marks them so. > > That's what I could say for review process. > > "Maintainers stuff", I *guess*, is: > after review&test Tony Requests netdev Maintainers to Pull > (and throttles outgoing stuff by doing so to pace agreed upon). > At that stage is a last moment for (late?) review, welcomed as always. It means that we (netdev@... ) will see "same" patches twice, am I right? Thanks > > > > > > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-wired-lan mailing list > > Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org > > https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan > >