From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5ACD2FF for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 09:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D171986 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4018af103bcso1834025e9.1 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:08:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692868137; x=1693472937; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WUc/Cv2OkEiyYX7xCFXe4Ptk+hBJ2RXc4IETa+Q50dg=; b=pEbJEY80FTZoAeDlwLjdzWmLlmuYCe9LdBh+AGJitV3DFrsbA64sunckOutgY8eBMW /g6B+Bqk/9xC7Wniey7/udc/662XBUbJcVhQWMCVvpcLzo/6if8WMpS/G6jgsNh3pyI/ fwgbDrBEbvBY1N8TqHyQLk/yomzJAE82dxHyeGWYs0Gvf1ruO5hSHjCsHYSfZXHMIn+T qwf+6EmI654PJYyKSZam55EC6AGOwJREizL2ZgKkYB5CD7AMkAy5qjk4Hlx9rgZieyc8 IIPL++fxJDDDC4Fa0uEQ5G7i9uN0EhU5w86Pxay3Ua5OpcNE2A2KNCsY1hFum+W9urJB UC2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692868137; x=1693472937; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WUc/Cv2OkEiyYX7xCFXe4Ptk+hBJ2RXc4IETa+Q50dg=; b=LcMLytJBUX91P327miEOeQ4sLBHccchnHaLADP596NvBvfGaCIT51dDwXsojHDMdMx EDSglpIdP84LgYKZFZXjJIrqGyi6xFRCme7rYVZQw4nvq2gLCBo1Cs9Jl7f/cJ2bqHEW Q/MFpVwGoWmekMztJCWGC3VqGMCFk9tHLxpKFx+2LzDKseqkH+O594Kr1fuJ4MAfkC8M 2SmhB8kiUJ+PlWr8euos24tz9ZYM3/LeujG+jzMGrvIKOtfSk8vrMVIap8d5NHh79n3i moc2UCx6FdQRminkb2ea65uZSV6kRaHoJCeknLyL5il0J6+w6Tw1SoIxzEPKyFe08N+I pieg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7H34OpyrisSmUqzZnEaV62T59RxjSrEBZtHRk6UBp5A+aMSBD hqFQFYG0llW8bXwZU0GEw0Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEQlT2xVR5bRcIMneJtEoRBPZbY7L+MpDtOZOGZUlpFHV1+vx61NaQjC0h6vu1EaBICwjHzvw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c8d0:0:b0:3f6:d90:3db with SMTP id f16-20020a7bc8d0000000b003f60d9003dbmr12196390wml.3.1692868136701; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([81.168.73.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l5-20020a1ced05000000b003fc01495383sm2032373wmh.6.2023.08.24.02.08.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:08:54 +0100 From: Martin Habets To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to Message-ID: <20230824090854.GA464302@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jakub Kicinski , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com References: <20230823154922.1162644-1-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230823154922.1162644-1-kuba@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:49:22AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > It's somewhat unfortunate but with (my?) the current tooling > if people post new versions of a set in reply to an old version > managing the review queue gets difficult. So recommend against it. Is this something NIPA could catch? > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Reviewed-by: Martin Habets > --- > Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst > index 2ab843cde830..c1c732e9748b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst > @@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ Asking the maintainer for status updates on your > patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the > bottom of the priority list. > > +.. _Changes requested: > + > Changes requested > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > @@ -359,6 +361,10 @@ Make sure you address all the feedback in your new posting. Do not post a new > version of the code if the discussion about the previous version is still > ongoing, unless directly instructed by a reviewer. > > +The new version of patches should be posted as a separate thread, > +not as a reply to the previous posting. Change log should include a link > +to the previous posting (see :ref:`Changes requested`). > + > Testing > ------- > > -- > 2.41.0 >