From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A85D314 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C460619BA for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 04:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9a58dbd5daeso78428266b.2 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 04:43:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693050187; x=1693654987; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=snB0XFE0xq/DdBgntDAZ5eDzi93Voobdcub3YXS6W9M=; b=JydLWUyFO9FzWHp/YOEbKeZfsYX/COfYOqUeX0nQQQRHFrfYyTgdolSf2v06SVo4w4 PeVzWT1c5wZcm+Zt4hgwOZ+eWt47Yf2t64PrLuATxGm0ztp+x0G2a6aQXmTTRbIBQPXC 8XlEIneVqPxP5lWjFs3gxL5jl5vpQ4YrCUAcDoHFWCtJXOzsQGuTvPKa35gSyHlgIa2v R9aVNWEmdHHsnI5VvQ6QP9MlN2c27QBuIriggsqi7wVm6A7GVQM2iBvN1Yl6N5JO8ZAq nHiSfG4sTWdBaNrBgeXwQWDGrAtggBVfTK4bnTA/zzsz/eKZzUGnGsw+/ezsvjB4GcC6 ZLrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693050187; x=1693654987; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=snB0XFE0xq/DdBgntDAZ5eDzi93Voobdcub3YXS6W9M=; b=CaG8IEme9B6G40x6TLF93egZgVUpDnId+2PU7MhNzucKoItLgVg74JmspnC1CGCVGg LrHes9d7DWlCvayoCI1BVV4fsK+t7Tscog7MkHhCH4mk47qY4QEKbKF0RNgI7dksUlrE KKwmSANvqvDKvwGWTxwPWDtAzWdJYFNgcCNLndlpl+VQsm8M7naoQ6WtGpyCEm7fJNME 1+iaNoO1QVBsiY622dDhR2mFWiMlP0GawvLFD/b1e8JLqlp/vFYUPJwBNTgNHYIUqh23 S20JCkCECyJuIv56EAhmQGK/6q6FBmdh2DE3L5OBgNonW9gYL9qy1fHIcRNKxUHINOKr 8U7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwSGjmhcfY50P+Brk71Q9ksHmua0JlMK9FuP4smuojtseZBN3Hm vTkITwvcAhqYqV9pAWiQJxc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGKOQ9Mo1W2GbT8UXWXyz88XQb9exPH48CZqwy+HHUVG9jisB/ugiqvm31V6qKWgrNZMgTPdg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2cf1:b0:9a1:e1cf:6c70 with SMTP id hz17-20020a1709072cf100b009a1e1cf6c70mr7569123ejc.6.1693050187142; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 04:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.27.184.225]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fx13-20020a170906b74d00b00982be08a9besm2123065ejb.172.2023.08.26.04.43.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Aug 2023 04:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:43:04 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Brian Hutchinson , Tristram.Ha@microchip.com, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com Cc: Christian Eggers , netdev@vger.kernel.org, arun.ramadoss@microchip.com, rakesh.sankaranarayanan@microchip.com Subject: Re: Microchip net DSA with ptp4l getting tx_timeout failed msg using 6.3.12 kernel and KSZ9567 switch Message-ID: <20230826114304.tb7dm3tr5gun5acs@skbuf> References: <4860127.31r3eYUQgx@n95hx1g2> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 03:03:32PM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > Update. Top posting because I think this is my issue. > > I dug further into my problem. I'm using E2E and it looks like the > mainlined Microchip KSZ DSA PTP code is only supporting P2P. > > The 5.10.69 kernel that I was first able to get working with > Christian's early pre-mainlined patches had: > 0016-net-dsa-microchip-ksz9477-add-E2E-support.patch > > ... which gets into the "sticky" bits of why these patches weren't > accepted in the first place due to some Microchip specific > implementation if I recall correctly. > > Regards, > > Brian +Tristram Ha, Woojung Huh