From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A160EEA0 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD9FCC433C7; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:38:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1693355901; bh=n9REtxpPEEcpgNQqc/Ep7uBG/38Dz7iopZPknXcvA2s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IwBl9zNkyRUx0Xluqb39Ilk2HLALCBnds271r75FiLGSzLE3NMSs+ELHU933rqsqy qcnUCPn4LkKK+wsRD5M3Gu+WyI4UxWckztXZiq12M64lb0HBt7+v9rr2iDbbwvw3g5 UrAfrfladyOiguMKSJPSCybVVJ9zccNPM6vVzANv9zrsQS65yNFkF9eo7BYwx94yQk QeTIaDQdFFlHQeTatUtN7isL88D3ZLD0/SCLlPWNeM9xgoVVGvXQ395jFbFmCinFH0 rJ05YmK6CUNirAJJ3z4WcKG+BBwnExMJ0fODtnF6KjDCdmGEKc9ZINBNHHuzguHJRY 8O+UdGEfJ4Z+w== Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 17:38:19 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Maglione, Gregorio" Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Paolo Abeni , Kuniyuki Iwashima , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Florian Westphal , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Rakocevic, Veselin" , "Markus.Amend@telekom.de" , "nathalie.romo-moreno@telekom.de" Subject: Re: DCCP Deprecation Message-ID: <20230829173819.5ddb6497@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230710182253.81446-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> <20230710133132.7c6ada3a@hermes.local> <0cb1b68794529c4d4493b5891f6dc0e9a3a03331.camel@redhat.com> <20230816080000.333b39c2@hermes.local> <20230816101547.1c292d64@hermes.local> <20230818092027.1542c503@hermes.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:17:08 +0000 Maglione, Gregorio wrote: > For the purpose of upstreaming, the repository was forked > [https://github.com/GREGORIO-M/mp-dccp] to remove non-GPL components > and to update the license to show GPL-2.0. Is this enough to solve > the license issue? If so, is it still agreeable for us to upstream > and maintain MP-DCCP, so that, once DCCP deprecates, MP-DCCP becomes > the sole DCCP enabler in the kernel? What steps would the upstreaming > involve? Do you require any information about the MP? Who is going to use it? Your earlier responses gave me the impression that you just need a number of implementations for the standardization process - apologies if I'm mistaken - but we suffered thru maintaining the unused DCCP code for years, we need real users who will care. Please use a sane email client you're responses are very hard to parse.