From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
davem@davemloft.net, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Tristram.Ha@microchip.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: Provide Module 4 KSZ9477 errata (DS80000754C)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:26:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230830142650.GL31399@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZO9Ejx9G8laNRasu@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:30:55PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 03:06:49PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 01:35:18PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 02:17:38PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 01:51:51PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > > > Hi Oleksij,
> > > >
> > > > > It looks like the most optimal solution would be the one proposed by
> > > > > Tristam:
> > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg932044.html
> > > >
> > > > In this case, please add the reason why it would work on this HW and
> > > > will not break by any changes in PHYlib or micrel.c driver.
> > > >
> > > > If I remember it correctly, in KSZ9477 variants, if you write to EEE
> > > > advertisement register, it will affect the state of a EEE capability
> > > > register. Which break IEEE 802.3 specification and the reason why
> > > > ksz9477_get_features() actually exist. But can be used as workaround if
> > > > it is written early enough before PHYlib tried to read EEE capability
> > > > register.
> > > >
> > > > Please confirm my assumption by applying your workaround and testing it
> > > > with ethtool --show-eee lanX.
> > > >
> > > > It should be commented in the code with all kind of warnings:
> > > > Don't move!!! We use one bug to workaround another bug!!! If PHYlib
> > > > start scanning PHYs before this code is executed, then thing may break!!
> > >
> > > Why would phylib's scanning cause breakage?
> > >
> > > phylib's scanning for PHYs is about reading the ID registers etc. It
> > > doesn't do anything until the PHY has been found, and then the first
> > > thing that happens when the phy_device structure is created is an
> > > appropriate driver is located, and the driver's ->probe function
> > > is called.
> > >
> > > If that is successful, then the fewatures are read. If the PHY
> > > driver's ->features member is set, then that initialises the
> > > "supported" mask and we read the EEE abilities.
> > >
> > > If ->features is not set, then we look to see whether the driver
> > > provides a ->get_features method, and call that.
> > >
> > > Otherwise we use the generic genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities() or
> > > genphy_read_abilities() depending whether the PHY's is_c45 is set
> > > or not.
> > >
> > > So, if you want to do something very early before features are read,
> > > then either don't set .features, and do it early in .get_features
> > > before calling anything else, or do it in the ->probe function.
> >
> > Let me summarize my view on the problem, so may be you can suggest a better
> > way to solve it.
> > - KSZ9477, KSZ8565, KSZ9893, KSZ9563, seems to have different quirks by
> > the same PHYid. micrel.c driver do now know what exact HW is actually
> > in use.
> > - A set of PHY workarounds was moved from dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c to
> > micrel.c, one of this workaround was clearing EEE advertisement
> > register, which by accident was clearing EEE capability register.
> > Since EEE cap was cleared by the dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c code before
> > micrel.c was probed, PHYlib was assuming that his PHY do not supports
> > EEE and dint tried to use it.
> > After moving this code to micrel.c, it is now trying to change EEE
> > advertisement state without letting PHYlib to know about it and PHYlib
> > re enables it as actually excepted.
> > - so far, only KSZ9477 seems to be broken beyond repair, so it is better
> > to disable EEE without giving it as a choice for user configuration.
>
> We do have support in phylib for "broken EEE modes" which DT could set
> for the broken PHYs, and as it is possible to describe the DSA PHYs in
> DT. This sets phydev->eee_broken_modes.
>
> phydev->eee_broken_modes gets looked at when genphy_config_aneg() or
> genphy_c45_an_config_aneg() gets called - which will happen when the
> PHY is being "started".
>
> So, you could add the DT properties as appropriate to disable all the
> EEE modes.
>
> Alternatively, in your .config_init function, you could detect your
> flag and force eee_broken_modes to all-ones.
@Lukasz,
can you please try to set eee_broken_modes to all-ones. Somewhat like
this:
ksz9477_config_init()
...
...quirks...
if (phydev->dev_flages & .. NO_EEE...)
phydev->eee_broken_modes = -1;
err = genphy_restart_aneg(phydev);
...
@Russell, thx!
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 9:21 [PATCH 1/2] net: phy: Rename KSZ9477 get features function (to ksz9131_get_features) Lukasz Majewski
2023-08-30 9:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: Provide Module 4 KSZ9477 errata (DS80000754C) Lukasz Majewski
2023-08-30 9:48 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2023-08-30 10:37 ` Lukasz Majewski
2023-08-30 10:18 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-08-30 10:52 ` Lukasz Majewski
2023-08-30 10:59 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-08-30 11:51 ` Lukasz Majewski
2023-08-30 12:17 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-08-30 12:35 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-30 13:06 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-08-30 13:30 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-30 14:26 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2023-08-30 14:38 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-30 14:48 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-08-30 16:38 ` Lukasz Majewski
2023-08-31 4:40 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-08-31 7:13 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-30 13:23 ` Lukasz Majewski
2023-08-30 11:20 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-30 11:08 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-30 11:20 ` Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230830142650.GL31399@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).