From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3B3911C91 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 20:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw1-x1149.google.com (mail-yw1-x1149.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1149]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583709E for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1149.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-59504967e00so2997067b3.2 for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 13:10:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1694031053; x=1694635853; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fLLHXKagUp75BI6OdSs0vVw5ugFWeBckDK23IiluvXQ=; b=Sl6XiOyB5CLSrzfS+ozaR0HVuuIzNg1WXydfwpNL2/AIk+lIxH0OSNVfiCTbV/E57+ dGRMp+ShxHDtiintd0uU6eW8zosCcwAnNc+qpIdpkahPRnuj8oyiCxnZQxWhnVkPQj2q Jx4PZMOiNeGGeJvVPDCZwr587UiPcUKHUWKTFGA20QVhxdOZvtYktCRXNZeH8MdiEk4/ GQLWaSDn5wZZWvKkYF6bFOvFyR51bQbZImb1P/5fg9hIqajiDD3+vyrmzb0SDk6L/D4s sNR+Ew+1ws7C3TUhf1fP6RL3AoUCRAk8Yz1QGHL97MGwYCTh6vVSp6clGBq4KdkRmTrp EkqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1694031053; x=1694635853; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fLLHXKagUp75BI6OdSs0vVw5ugFWeBckDK23IiluvXQ=; b=UGVvyeID0igLJJjuX9MMVe2QinlM1g5DF8ZHos9EbHrPKY/GNIFnJ21BTiBF9JUDvN 3KqiiWujYbVqle5a9R0KMKvsKt4VHANCLpnV2zLnyPtpuToCyRpHICh+ZJDuIJaFyGv7 7H+M0t1ofu3uPY5LF+lFl489Y+2VFSWUkQwhVG7+mGR6RGGbJETatg006h1RQlKuZUPT hkKjZ5olyjL+AsXCQzpGwBjhynM+bOBnkOBOtm0ykeQGAQgsiyUBzeKVFGGdNCt31YY8 lpAaVapFC9PfHw0/kiek9me+Loh0NFiov1h0mTRt2Cp7pYkQNoc2YEr6MtZxz7aOCRdD ZGbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwznTmoua2Rc3vqHEHIhchC6pGIxbMJ5zc294Z/qRl1MRcKeWOJ 9HvyYXPea8nQzGzW9s1QZ7RdjM54GBnRIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHP6nGB7uHD/zfSAXRdYmMBoNUbyAzwX3eTe7FnRATD+BZIikpFrBwJ40Cy3vfh54i3lt6kgpdHERgIhw== X-Received: from edumazet1.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:2b:7d90:c0a8:395a]) (user=edumazet job=sendgmr) by 2002:a81:4101:0:b0:586:896e:58b1 with SMTP id o1-20020a814101000000b00586896e58b1mr445952ywa.0.1694031053666; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 13:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 20:10:43 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20230906201046.463236-1-edumazet@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230906201046.463236-1-edumazet@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog Message-ID: <20230906201046.463236-2-edumazet@google.com> Subject: [RFC net-next 1/4] tcp: no longer release socket ownership in tcp_release_cb() From: Eric Dumazet To: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh , Neal Cardwell , Yuchung Cheng , Eric Dumazet Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net This partially reverts c3f9b01849ef ("tcp: tcp_release_cb() should release socket ownership"). prequeue has been removed by Florian in commit e7942d0633c4 ("tcp: remove prequeue support") __tcp_checksum_complete_user() being gone, we no longer have to release socket ownership in tcp_release_cb(). This is a prereq for third patch in the series ("net: call prot->release_cb() when processing backlog"). Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet --- net/core/sock.c | 3 --- net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 10 ---------- 2 files changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 16584e2dd6481a3fc28d796db785439f0446703b..21610e3845a5042f7c648ccb3e0d90126df20a0b 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -3519,9 +3519,6 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk) if (sk->sk_backlog.tail) __release_sock(sk); - /* Warning : release_cb() might need to release sk ownership, - * ie call sock_release_ownership(sk) before us. - */ if (sk->sk_prot->release_cb) sk->sk_prot->release_cb(sk); diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c index ccfc8bbf745586cd23dcf02d755d6981dc92742e..b4cac12d0e6348aaa3a3957b0091ea7fe6553731 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c @@ -1101,16 +1101,6 @@ void tcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk) tcp_tsq_write(sk); __sock_put(sk); } - /* Here begins the tricky part : - * We are called from release_sock() with : - * 1) BH disabled - * 2) sk_lock.slock spinlock held - * 3) socket owned by us (sk->sk_lock.owned == 1) - * - * But following code is meant to be called from BH handlers, - * so we should keep BH disabled, but early release socket ownership - */ - sock_release_ownership(sk); if (flags & TCPF_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED) { tcp_write_timer_handler(sk); -- 2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog