netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sgoutham@marvell.com, gakula@marvell.com, sbhatta@marvell.com,
	hkelam@marvell.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, hawk@kernel.org,
	alexander.duyck@gmail.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org,
	linyunsheng@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix page pool cache index corruption.
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 09:09:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230907070955.0kdmjXbB@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907014711.3869840-1-rkannoth@marvell.com>

On 2023-09-07 07:17:11 [+0530], Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> The access to page pool `cache' array and the `count' variable
> is not locked. Page pool cache access is fine as long as there
> is only one consumer per pool.
> 
> octeontx2 driver fills in rx buffers from page pool in NAPI context.
> If system is stressed and could not allocate buffers, refiiling work
> will be delegated to a delayed workqueue. This means that there are
> two cosumers to the page pool cache.
> 
> Either workqueue or IRQ/NAPI can be run on other CPU. This will lead
> to lock less access, hence corruption of cache pool indexes.
> 
> To fix this issue, NAPI is rescheduled from workqueue context to refill
> rx buffers.
> 
> Fixes: b2e3406a38f0 ("octeontx2-pf: Add support for page pool")
> Signed-off-by: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>

Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
> index 8511906cb4e2..997fedac3a98 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c
>  static void otx2_pool_refill_task(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct otx2_cq_queue *cq;
> -	struct otx2_pool *rbpool;
>  	struct refill_work *wrk;
> -	int qidx, free_ptrs = 0;
>  	struct otx2_nic *pfvf;
> -	dma_addr_t bufptr;
> +	int qidx;
>  
>  	wrk = container_of(work, struct refill_work, pool_refill_work.work);
>  	pfvf = wrk->pf;
>  	qidx = wrk - pfvf->refill_wrk;
>  	cq = &pfvf->qset.cq[qidx];
>  	cq->refill_task_sched = false;
> +
> +	local_bh_disable();
> +	napi_schedule(wrk->napi);
> +	local_bh_enable();

This is a nitpick since I haven't look how it works exactly: Is it
possible that the wrk->napi pointer gets overwritten by
otx2_napi_handler() since you cleared cq->refill_task_sched() earlier?

>  }
>  
>  int otx2_config_nix_queues(struct otx2_nic *pfvf)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> index e369baf11530..b778ed366f81 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> @@ -561,9 +565,24 @@ int otx2_napi_handler(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  				otx2_config_irq_coalescing(pfvf, i);
>  		}
>  
> -		/* Re-enable interrupts */
> -		otx2_write64(pfvf, NIX_LF_CINTX_ENA_W1S(cq_poll->cint_idx),
> -			     BIT_ULL(0));
> +		if (unlikely(!filled_cnt)) {
> +			struct refill_work *work;
> +			struct delayed_work *dwork;
> +
> +			work = &pfvf->refill_wrk[cq->cq_idx];
> +			dwork = &work->pool_refill_work;
> +			/* Schedule a task if no other task is running */
> +			if (!cq->refill_task_sched) {
> +				work->napi = napi;
> +				cq->refill_task_sched = true;
> +				schedule_delayed_work(dwork,
> +						      msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* Re-enable interrupts */
> +			otx2_write64(pfvf, NIX_LF_CINTX_ENA_W1S(cq_poll->cint_idx),
> +				     BIT_ULL(0));
> +		}
>  	}
>  	return workdone;
>  }

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-07 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-07  1:47 [PATCH net v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix page pool cache index corruption Ratheesh Kannoth
2023-09-07  7:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2023-09-07  8:15   ` [EXT] " Ratheesh Kannoth
2023-09-07 10:15     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-07 15:08 ` Simon Horman
2023-09-08  2:51   ` [EXT] " Ratheesh Kannoth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230907070955.0kdmjXbB@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gakula@marvell.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkannoth@marvell.com \
    --cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
    --cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).