* [PATCH net v2] r8152: avoid the driver drops a lot of packets
@ 2023-09-06 3:11 Hayes Wang
2023-09-07 0:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hayes Wang @ 2023-09-06 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kuba, davem; +Cc: netdev, nic_swsd, linux-kernel, linux-usb, Hayes Wang
Stop submitting rx, if the driver queue more than 256 packets.
If the hardware is more fast than the software, the driver would start
queuing the packets. And, the driver starts dropping the packets, if it
queues more than 1000 packets.
Increase the weight of NAPI could improve the situation. However, the
weight has been changed to 64, so we have to stop submitting rx when the
driver queues too many packets. Then, the device may send the pause frame
to slow down the receiving, when the FIFO of the device is full.
Fixes: cf74eb5a5bc8 ("eth: r8152: try to use a normal budget")
Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
---
v2:
Add WARN_ON_ONCE() and debug message for the skb_queue_len(&tp->rx_queue).
drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
index 332c853ca99b..4a62e420a7be 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
@@ -2484,10 +2484,6 @@ static int rx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp, int budget)
unsigned int pkt_len, rx_frag_head_sz;
struct sk_buff *skb;
- /* limit the skb numbers for rx_queue */
- if (unlikely(skb_queue_len(&tp->rx_queue) >= 1000))
- break;
-
pkt_len = le32_to_cpu(rx_desc->opts1) & RX_LEN_MASK;
if (pkt_len < ETH_ZLEN)
break;
@@ -2556,9 +2552,14 @@ static int rx_bottom(struct r8152 *tp, int budget)
}
submit:
- if (!ret) {
+ if (!ret && likely(skb_queue_len(&tp->rx_queue) < 256)) {
ret = r8152_submit_rx(tp, agg, GFP_ATOMIC);
} else {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_queue_len(&tp->rx_queue) >= 1000);
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ netif_dbg(tp, rx_err, tp->netdev,
+ "submit_rx=%d, rx_queue=%u\n",
+ ret, skb_queue_len(&tp->rx_queue));
urb->actual_length = 0;
list_add_tail(&agg->list, next);
}
--
2.41.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v2] r8152: avoid the driver drops a lot of packets
2023-09-06 3:11 [PATCH net v2] r8152: avoid the driver drops a lot of packets Hayes Wang
@ 2023-09-07 0:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-09-07 7:16 ` Hayes Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2023-09-07 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hayes Wang; +Cc: davem, netdev, nic_swsd, linux-kernel, linux-usb
On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 11:11:48 +0800 Hayes Wang wrote:
> Stop submitting rx, if the driver queue more than 256 packets.
>
> If the hardware is more fast than the software, the driver would start
> queuing the packets. And, the driver starts dropping the packets, if it
> queues more than 1000 packets.
>
> Increase the weight of NAPI could improve the situation. However, the
> weight has been changed to 64, so we have to stop submitting rx when the
> driver queues too many packets. Then, the device may send the pause frame
> to slow down the receiving, when the FIFO of the device is full.
Good to see that you can repro the problem.
Before we tweak the heuristics let's make sure rx_bottom() behaves
correctly. Could you make sure that
- we don't perform _any_ rx processing when budget is 0
(see the NAPI documentation under Documentation/networking)
- finish the current aggregate even if budget run out, return
work_done = budget in that case.
With this change the rx_queue thing should be gone completely.
- instead of copying the head use napi_get_frags() + napi_gro_frags()
it gives you an skb, you just attach the page to it as a frag and
hand it back to GRO. This makes sure you never pull data into head
rather than just headers.
Please share the performance results with those changes.
--
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH net v2] r8152: avoid the driver drops a lot of packets
2023-09-07 0:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2023-09-07 7:16 ` Hayes Wang
2023-09-07 16:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hayes Wang @ 2023-09-07 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nic_swsd,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 8:29 AM
[...]
> Good to see that you can repro the problem.
I don't reproduce the problem. I just find some information about it.
> Before we tweak the heuristics let's make sure rx_bottom() behaves
> correctly. Could you make sure that
> - we don't perform _any_ rx processing when budget is 0
> (see the NAPI documentation under Documentation/networking)
The work_done would be 0, and napi_complete_done() wouldn't be called.
However, skb_queue_len(&tp->rx_queue) may be increased. I think it is
not acceptable, right?
> - finish the current aggregate even if budget run out, return
> work_done = budget in that case.
> With this change the rx_queue thing should be gone completely.
Excuse me. I don't understand this part. I know that when the packets are
more than budget, the maximum packets which could be handled is budget.
That is, return work_done = budget. However, the extra packets would be queued
to rx_queue. I don't understand what you mean about " the rx_queue thing
should be gone completely". I think the current driver would return
work_done = budget, and queue the other packets. I don't sure what you
want me to change.
> - instead of copying the head use napi_get_frags() + napi_gro_frags()
> it gives you an skb, you just attach the page to it as a frag and
> hand it back to GRO. This makes sure you never pull data into head
> rather than just headers.
I would study about them. Thanks.
Should I include above changes for this patch?
I think I have to submit another patches for above.
> Please share the performance results with those changes.
I couldn't reproduce the problem, so I couldn't provide the result
with the differences.
Best Regards,
Hayes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v2] r8152: avoid the driver drops a lot of packets
2023-09-07 7:16 ` Hayes Wang
@ 2023-09-07 16:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2023-09-07 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hayes Wang
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nic_swsd,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 07:16:50 +0000 Hayes Wang wrote:
> > Before we tweak the heuristics let's make sure rx_bottom() behaves
> > correctly. Could you make sure that
> > - we don't perform _any_ rx processing when budget is 0
> > (see the NAPI documentation under Documentation/networking)
>
> The work_done would be 0, and napi_complete_done() wouldn't be called.
> However, skb_queue_len(&tp->rx_queue) may be increased. I think it is
> not acceptable, right?
If budget is 0 we got called by netconsole, meaning we may be holding
arbitrary locks. And we can't use napi_alloc_skb() which is for
softirq/bh context only. We should only try to complete Tx in that
case, since r8152_poll() doesn't handle any Tx the right thing seems
to be to add if (!budget) return 0;
> > - finish the current aggregate even if budget run out, return
> > work_done = budget in that case.
> > With this change the rx_queue thing should be gone completely.
>
> Excuse me. I don't understand this part. I know that when the packets are
> more than budget, the maximum packets which could be handled is budget.
> That is, return work_done = budget. However, the extra packets would be queued
> to rx_queue. I don't understand what you mean about " the rx_queue thing
> should be gone completely". I think the current driver would return
> work_done = budget, and queue the other packets. I don't sure what you
> want me to change.
Nothing will explode if we process a few more packets than budget
(assuming budget > 0). If we already do allocations and prepare
those skbs - there's no point holding onto them in the driver.
Just sent them up the stack (and then we won't need the local rx_queue).
> > - instead of copying the head use napi_get_frags() + napi_gro_frags()
> > it gives you an skb, you just attach the page to it as a frag and
> > hand it back to GRO. This makes sure you never pull data into head
> > rather than just headers.
>
> I would study about them. Thanks.
>
> Should I include above changes for this patch?
> I think I have to submit another patches for above.
>
> > Please share the performance results with those changes.
>
> I couldn't reproduce the problem, so I couldn't provide the result
> with the differences.
Hm, if you can't repro my intuition would be to only take the patch for
budget=0 handling into net, and the rest as improvements into net-next.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-07 18:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-06 3:11 [PATCH net v2] r8152: avoid the driver drops a lot of packets Hayes Wang
2023-09-07 0:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-09-07 7:16 ` Hayes Wang
2023-09-07 16:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).