From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42CA6154AE for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-fw-52004.amazon.com (smtp-fw-52004.amazon.com [52.119.213.154]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F7741AB for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:38:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1694457511; x=1725993511; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lMt6JlEbxHuUhnVh39GZ47uJ7tzfb8Brra7KxTHVFks=; b=tOPZTJ5pYO2O3cYsgOFvFVeUh7VZS3IO1xN87aQqlscuXM7FPsQOGkEG WtwhwLP3DkU1xGkW/7OgBbRAj4sydPWW8FRc+Bn6cJufYc+q6YATwP4bV V6pkqGMFS2RVINndF1PltiQI8YaYDcDwgwu6oQNXIMfrSKeQOWtCV89+0 Q=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,244,1688428800"; d="scan'208";a="153778113" Received: from iad12-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan2.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-iad-1a-m6i4x-617e30c2.us-east-1.amazon.com) ([10.43.8.2]) by smtp-border-fw-52004.iad7.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2023 18:38:28 +0000 Received: from EX19MTAUWB002.ant.amazon.com (iad12-ws-svc-p26-lb9-vlan2.iad.amazon.com [10.40.163.34]) by email-inbound-relay-iad-1a-m6i4x-617e30c2.us-east-1.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE42680B9; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) by EX19MTAUWB002.ant.amazon.com (10.250.64.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.37; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:38:25 +0000 Received: from 88665a182662.ant.amazon.com (10.187.171.14) by EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.37; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:38:23 +0000 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima To: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , David Ahern CC: Joanne Koong , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Subject: [PATCH v2 net 3/6] tcp: Fix bind() regression for v4-mapped-v6 non-wildcard address. Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:36:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20230911183700.60878-4-kuniyu@amazon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20230911183700.60878-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> References: <20230911183700.60878-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.187.171.14] X-ClientProxiedBy: EX19D031UWC002.ant.amazon.com (10.13.139.212) To EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) Precedence: Bulk X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SPF_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Since bhash2 was introduced, the example below does not work as expected. These two bind() should conflict, but the 2nd bind() now succeeds. from socket import * s1 = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM) s1.bind(('::ffff:127.0.0.1', 0)) s2 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM) s2.bind(('127.0.0.1', s1.getsockname()[1])) During the 2nd bind() in inet_csk_get_port(), inet_bind2_bucket_find() fails to find the 1st socket's tb2, so inet_bind2_bucket_create() allocates a new tb2 for the 2nd socket. Then, we call inet_csk_bind_conflict() that checks conflicts in the new tb2 by inet_bhash2_conflict(). However, the new tb2 does not include the 1st socket, thus the bind() finally succeeds. In this case, inet_bind2_bucket_match() must check if AF_INET6 tb2 has the conflicting v4-mapped-v6 address so that inet_bind2_bucket_find() returns the 1st socket's tb2. Note that if we bind two sockets to 127.0.0.1 and then ::FFFF:127.0.0.1, the 2nd bind() fails properly for the same reason mentinoed in the previous commit. Fixes: 28044fc1d495 ("net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address") Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima --- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c index a58b04052ca6..c32f5e28758b 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c @@ -820,8 +820,13 @@ static bool inet_bind2_bucket_match(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb, return false; #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) - if (sk->sk_family != tb->family) + if (sk->sk_family != tb->family) { + if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET) + return ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr) && + tb->v6_rcv_saddr.s6_addr32[3] == sk->sk_rcv_saddr; + return false; + } if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) return ipv6_addr_equal(&tb->v6_rcv_saddr, &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr); -- 2.30.2