From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>, Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Subject: [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5: Convert SF port_indices xarray to function_ids xarray
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 23:35:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920063552.296978-4-saeed@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920063552.296978-1-saeed@kernel.org>
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
No need to lookup for sf by a port index. Convert the xarray to have
function id as an index and optimize the remaining function id
based lookup.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
.../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c | 29 +++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c
index b4a373d2ba15..78cdfe595a01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/devlink.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static void *mlx5_sf_by_dl_port(struct devlink_port *dl_port)
struct mlx5_sf_table {
struct mlx5_core_dev *dev; /* To refer from notifier context. */
- struct xarray port_indices; /* port index based lookup. */
+ struct xarray function_ids; /* function id based lookup. */
refcount_t refcount;
struct completion disable_complete;
struct mutex sf_state_lock; /* Serializes sf state among user cmds & vhca event handler. */
@@ -41,24 +41,17 @@ struct mlx5_sf_table {
static struct mlx5_sf *
mlx5_sf_lookup_by_function_id(struct mlx5_sf_table *table, unsigned int fn_id)
{
- unsigned long index;
- struct mlx5_sf *sf;
-
- xa_for_each(&table->port_indices, index, sf) {
- if (sf->hw_fn_id == fn_id)
- return sf;
- }
- return NULL;
+ return xa_load(&table->function_ids, fn_id);
}
-static int mlx5_sf_id_insert(struct mlx5_sf_table *table, struct mlx5_sf *sf)
+static int mlx5_sf_function_id_insert(struct mlx5_sf_table *table, struct mlx5_sf *sf)
{
- return xa_insert(&table->port_indices, sf->port_index, sf, GFP_KERNEL);
+ return xa_insert(&table->function_ids, sf->hw_fn_id, sf, GFP_KERNEL);
}
-static void mlx5_sf_id_erase(struct mlx5_sf_table *table, struct mlx5_sf *sf)
+static void mlx5_sf_function_id_erase(struct mlx5_sf_table *table, struct mlx5_sf *sf)
{
- xa_erase(&table->port_indices, sf->port_index);
+ xa_erase(&table->function_ids, sf->hw_fn_id);
}
static struct mlx5_sf *
@@ -95,7 +88,7 @@ mlx5_sf_alloc(struct mlx5_sf_table *table, struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
sf->hw_state = MLX5_VHCA_STATE_ALLOCATED;
sf->controller = controller;
- err = mlx5_sf_id_insert(table, sf);
+ err = mlx5_sf_function_id_insert(table, sf);
if (err)
goto insert_err;
@@ -348,7 +341,7 @@ int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_new(struct devlink *devlink,
static void mlx5_sf_dealloc(struct mlx5_sf_table *table, struct mlx5_sf *sf)
{
- mlx5_sf_id_erase(table, sf);
+ mlx5_sf_function_id_erase(table, sf);
if (sf->hw_state == MLX5_VHCA_STATE_ALLOCATED) {
mlx5_sf_free(table, sf);
@@ -452,7 +445,7 @@ static void mlx5_sf_deactivate_all(struct mlx5_sf_table *table)
/* At this point, no new user commands can start and no vhca event can
* arrive. It is safe to destroy all user created SFs.
*/
- xa_for_each(&table->port_indices, index, sf) {
+ xa_for_each(&table->function_ids, index, sf) {
mlx5_eswitch_unload_sf_vport(esw, sf->hw_fn_id);
mlx5_sf_dealloc(table, sf);
}
@@ -540,7 +533,7 @@ int mlx5_sf_table_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
mutex_init(&table->sf_state_lock);
table->dev = dev;
- xa_init(&table->port_indices);
+ xa_init(&table->function_ids);
dev->priv.sf_table = table;
refcount_set(&table->refcount, 0);
table->esw_nb.notifier_call = mlx5_sf_esw_event;
@@ -579,6 +572,6 @@ void mlx5_sf_table_cleanup(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
mlx5_esw_event_notifier_unregister(dev->priv.eswitch, &table->esw_nb);
WARN_ON(refcount_read(&table->refcount));
mutex_destroy(&table->sf_state_lock);
- WARN_ON(!xa_empty(&table->port_indices));
+ WARN_ON(!xa_empty(&table->function_ids));
kfree(table);
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 6:35 [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 updates 2023-09-19 Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Call mlx5_sf_id_erase() once in mlx5_sf_dealloc() Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-28 13:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5: Use devlink port pointer to get the pointer of container SF struct Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 04/15] net/mlx5: Move state lock taking into mlx5_sf_dealloc() Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 05/15] net/mlx5: Rename mlx5_sf_deactivate_all() to mlx5_sf_del_all() Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 06/15] net/mlx5: Push common deletion code into mlx5_sf_del() Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 07/15] net/mlx5: Remove SF table reference counting Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5: Remove redundant max_sfs check and field from struct mlx5_sf_dev_table Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 09/15] net/mlx5e: Consider aggregated port speed during rate configuration Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 10/15] net/mlx5e: Check police action rate for matchall filter Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5: Bridge, Enable mcast in smfs steering mode Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5: DR, Add check for multi destination FTE Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 13/15] net/mlx5: DR, Handle multi destination action in the right order Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5: Add a health error syndrome for pci data poisoned Saeed Mahameed
2023-09-20 6:35 ` [net-next 15/15] net/mlx5: Enable 4 ports multiport E-switch Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230920063552.296978-4-saeed@kernel.org \
--to=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).