From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEFD7ED for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 10:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E72B4; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 03:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-98377c5d53eso128625266b.0; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 03:44:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696329854; x=1696934654; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TmEctcMUVbCclk9m0goiD7O58kPkk9ozB1JI3JI/hPI=; b=K1/kJY9K8EJ7fSrU72OqYrJhm2cJSz0s1997Vjw6C5j9evTc2EgmDcuklFCeQHV9xF imQQyAIEmf4xVeYFvJRMWKZzDaTqwaykb0fXY/vSEZCURwwRykkPimic2SogGh4dM30E 1FoYt1yx60ot7ikxzE9rNXfmQExVSFreDLqzciiKGn6PqXXzaWTrxyc8GK9jqVtKJNgU op10bFM96uKVYJy1WK1+jqgs4BQqTzdwR7govo9UjYQMCfRyHSBYfcBzXXMBgRXVRk1X Ur5V+PGDCz2dmEEz39McVXZ9/HzADNTQ2Vx6HhOzePtLXQqpihWPCwS4w0rrKgsTPeA5 y7kQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696329854; x=1696934654; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TmEctcMUVbCclk9m0goiD7O58kPkk9ozB1JI3JI/hPI=; b=YykS7G26Lmmb5+KbHJsnjc4arL1O3JUJRlKaVFoxPy2jLe8J0N7nHWnDjBoWsd803+ C8xPyT4D80nffI32/CslYZMd2dCr/Iy/qDRkJmfKche+tiGOtgjL3NS1PWo8m4d1xyOD j6GdPM8EfxMT0yr5z46ZGqJh0uYm8ymF2X9MzWyxQ072LXCzYMffOjjFsOXNF+ZzUykh WYI9WyJK4zlHLXLiguku9wuqoCVXjGerx5V85f3YOxnY0Ll6yzxlmPkr4aMy4gHOtJNS 5eDWMZDa7rg5mqPSEsZsrzArN6437A+kItsKUGI1qEIdQas17d6byjBA+mBB6Ccajt9Q PTfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx6YDwm+Asf92A7mJVMYtkW676yXLb6lSWU0IgnsRQgSBi7VX2s vGqqwC1T5eQzzZtbKY8Pr4gdMMrQ1AQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGeoM+GI4kBmhQElhTrw5bnp/MJFivmYswqf/ln69nM1n6ZfvZtRodCaIcEDAax2e51jphWYw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:75c6:b0:9b6:d9ae:402c with SMTP id jl6-20020a17090775c600b009b6d9ae402cmr919777ejc.61.1696329853452; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 03:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.255.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c20-20020a170906529400b0098d2d219649sm850616ejm.174.2023.10.03.03.44.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Oct 2023 03:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:44:10 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Andrew Lunn , Woojung Huh , Tristram.Ha@microchip.com, Eric Dumazet , davem@davemloft.net, Oleksij Rempel , Florian Fainelli , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 0/5] net: dsa: hsr: Enable HSR HW offloading for KSZ9477 Message-ID: <20231003104410.dhngn3vvdfdcurga@skbuf> References: <20230922133108.2090612-1-lukma@denx.de> <20230926225401.bganxwmtrgkiz2di@skbuf> <20230928124127.379115e6@wsk> <20231003095832.4bec4c72@wsk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231003095832.4bec4c72@wsk> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:58:32AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled with this patch series - will it be pulled directly > to net-next [1] or is there any other (KSZ maintainer's?) tree to which > it will be first pulled and then PR will be send to net-next? > > Thanks in advance for the clarification. > > Links: > > [1] - > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/log/ No, there's no other tree than net-next. I see your patch was marked as "Changes requested", let me see if I can transition it back to "Under review" so that it gains the netdev maintainers' attention again: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20230922133108.2090612-1-lukma@denx.de/ pw-bot: under-review