From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC01F2915 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED6D91; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 05:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wsk (85-222-111-42.dynamic.chello.pl [85.222.111.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lukma@denx.de) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C85687102; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:51:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=phobos-20191101; t=1696337473; bh=aaprkLAz8M28X4vHEFfK4xuZcsmFV8/uA9susaQBpHI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gUy6gV7Jf2LmC+75CGPiHiNeLdQZqdbjOXHDGCWy2IVIny+rTbN0fjqN1FO5z4Mgh AnuxgZrU5yy8FI4edE5i46BvziysCcF3FhxL3BqaSe4Q0ggW2GHUDbFmY6zKMJh3ja juiXSzXboZewVRIKjTZKxkRwjcDGyoTTTewijkPqkzbyIV6rrjafLgeiQvncpjTuti a5fCeLJJvMocllC96iDPP9A6oITP10g/Chr6b4YrJrvf0ozPoHVOSuSzGJS0J5t0U1 ayAYjXGp0k4svj0ufq53k5UxWinq4/Ed8mX8C4PXGzubg4uYkV3AXxKAqG+j/nKOlH cpc789T6qLz2Q== Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:51:06 +0200 From: Lukasz Majewski To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Andrew Lunn , Woojung Huh , Tristram.Ha@microchip.com, Eric Dumazet , davem@davemloft.net, Oleksij Rempel , Florian Fainelli , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 0/5] net: dsa: hsr: Enable HSR HW offloading for KSZ9477 Message-ID: <20231003145106.3cd5a19f@wsk> In-Reply-To: <20231003104410.dhngn3vvdfdcurga@skbuf> References: <20230922133108.2090612-1-lukma@denx.de> <20230926225401.bganxwmtrgkiz2di@skbuf> <20230928124127.379115e6@wsk> <20231003095832.4bec4c72@wsk> <20231003104410.dhngn3vvdfdcurga@skbuf> Organization: denx.de X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.19.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/DeKx4JaPtFZ3VK4fxaRFAgh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net --Sig_/DeKx4JaPtFZ3VK4fxaRFAgh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Vladimir, > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:58:32AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > I'm a bit puzzled with this patch series - will it be pulled > > directly to net-next [1] or is there any other (KSZ maintainer's?) > > tree to which it will be first pulled and then PR will be send to > > net-next? > >=20 > > Thanks in advance for the clarification. > >=20 > > Links: > >=20 > > [1] - > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/log/ > > =20 >=20 > No, there's no other tree than net-next. I see your patch was marked > as "Changes requested", let me see if I can transition it back to > "Under review" so that it gains the netdev maintainers' attention > again: >=20 > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20230922133108.20906= 12-1-lukma@denx.de/ >=20 > pw-bot: under-review Thanks! I've just noticed that there is a WARNING: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230922133108.2090612= -6-lukma@denx.de/ but then on the newest kernel checkpatch.pl is silent: ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0005-net-dsa-microchip-Enable-HSR-offloading-for-KSZ9477.patch total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 277 lines checked 0005-net-dsa-microchip-Enable-HSR-offloading-for-KSZ9477.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. Does the checkpatch for patchwork differs in any way from mainline? Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de --Sig_/DeKx4JaPtFZ3VK4fxaRFAgh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEgAyFJ+N6uu6+XupJAR8vZIA0zr0FAmUcDjoACgkQAR8vZIA0 zr383Qf/UDs6iZwqUh3JPM8lRrI19Hze1fJ2qEnCAinjhHYz5KFN2kpzFsOJvYN9 ESkNWN2mYJe55GyWs/BiV7vwGmtDR5PjcBvXSu/h8MkOnaJndK7ArvhscyssqyWv M4jFjLRAA7UKAS83gkm4ANa9aIs0MM3Q8dqg0akJq/QZFNYko7WyDLvZYBTe9psE +jsmzqTvRkqDFr4YwY0yflCdRO8ykYCdXsfgJaPz8uEQ5B271OpVhJMYNuJjpjh6 dL+8baMb1sqDF6OvkWq/pUl5DhY3c0SICRMPJGOoZBqf6HUO/6753e3rhq4U7dC7 9C2tMT/sYG31cCwhTLWXG06n3IERDw== =E0iA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DeKx4JaPtFZ3VK4fxaRFAgh--