From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B442E10780 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 22:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jvnJKHHo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B76AC433C8; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 22:46:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696459570; bh=8ro/a0Bpol+VYScaDsgjBSknL1h5UTqtEB8kDcWMyG4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jvnJKHHo4Zwbi3zpqsrtxGJ92sSZrwqygzCu0OelPHkLTm/cKqtk7YzSw314/QR6y BLtw0idqiTPN+2QQjkumlEUJx47RrJAVBxAq8RvkE0gNYBn4AxH0yvV3Y90R/q2uWw /TqVex7OdZ4VK35V1CkiFU+eiMWGOEi35Cwv5mca4xyBhCYPWb5rxXYIw/5yUlwuya 7oTaZLFVbM9KlruwAsBPpWgknQTO/v/HTR2IVZLzBHAEar39ZmLU+w1hTI0YWj+TxS 8FIFxL4c59v8FlId6w+XVe5zvWikhfuLNb6xqA4E01SoPCDigvbOBYKqIxFQzg1nlM MMmJmwdq6IHgw== Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 15:46:09 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Wander Lairson Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: Use SMP threads for backlog NAPI (or optional). Message-ID: <20231004154609.6007f1a0@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230929162121.1822900-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> References: <20230929162121.1822900-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 18:20:18 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > - Patch #2 has been removed. Removing the warning is still an option. > > - There are two patches in the series: > - Patch #1 always creates backlog threads > - Patch #2 creates the backlog threads if requested at boot time, > mandatory on PREEMPT_RT. > So it is either or and I wanted to show how both look like. > > - The kernel test robot reported a performance regression with > loopback (stress-ng --udp X --udp-ops Y) against the RFC version. > The regression is now avoided by using local-NAPI if backlog > processing is requested on the local CPU. Not what we asked for, and it doesn't apply.