* Re: [PATCH 6.5 000/321] 6.5.6-rc1 review
[not found] <20231004175229.211487444@linuxfoundation.org>
@ 2023-10-05 5:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-05 14:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-10-05 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Jinjie Ruan
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, Netdev, kunit-dev,
Eric Dumazet
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.5.6 release.
> There are 321 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.5.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.5.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
While running kunit testing on qemu-armv7 following test failures noticed
on stable rc 6.5.6-rc1.
# req_destroy works: EXPECTATION FAILED at net/handshake/handshake-test.c:477
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Test log:
----------
<6>[ 1351.687335] KTAP version 1
<6>[ 1351.688300] # Subtest: Handshake API tests
<6>[ 1351.688760] 1..11
<6>[ 1351.689362] KTAP version 1
<6>[ 1351.689985] # Subtest: req_alloc API fuzzing
<6>[ 1351.694360] ok 1 handshake_req_alloc NULL proto
<6>[ 1351.705855] ok 2 handshake_req_alloc CLASS_NONE
<6>[ 1351.710878] ok 3 handshake_req_alloc CLASS_MAX
<6>[ 1351.715435] ok 4 handshake_req_alloc no callbacks
<6>[ 1351.722026] ok 5 handshake_req_alloc no done callback
<6>[ 1351.726579] ok 6 handshake_req_alloc excessive privsize
<6>[ 1351.732397] ok 7 handshake_req_alloc all good
<6>[ 1351.732934] # req_alloc API fuzzing: pass:7 fail:0 skip:0 total:7
<6>[ 1351.733586] ok 1 req_alloc API fuzzing
<6>[ 1351.741251] ok 2 req_submit NULL req arg
<6>[ 1351.745979] ok 3 req_submit NULL sock arg
<6>[ 1351.753307] ok 4 req_submit NULL sock->file
<6>[ 1351.763090] ok 5 req_lookup works
<6>[ 1351.770057] ok 6 req_submit max pending
<6>[ 1351.774878] ok 7 req_submit multiple
<6>[ 1351.782411] ok 8 req_cancel before accept
<6>[ 1351.787423] ok 9 req_cancel after accept
<6>[ 1351.795660] ok 10 req_cancel after done
<3>[ 1351.799741] # req_destroy works: EXPECTATION FAILED at
net/handshake/handshake-test.c:477
<3>[ 1351.799741] Expected handshake_req_destroy_test == req, but
<3>[ 1351.799741] handshake_req_destroy_test == 00000000
<3>[ 1351.799741] req == cae22700
<6>[ 1351.803368] not ok 11 req_destroy works
<6>[ 1351.804539] # Handshake API tests: pass:10 fail:1 skip:0 total:11
<6>[ 1351.805460] # Totals: pass:16 fail:1 skip:0 total:17
<6>[ 1351.806276] not ok 95 Handshake API tests
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.5.y/build/v6.5.5-322-g9327d0db36be/testrun/20257175/suite/kunit/test/req_alloc/log
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.5.y/build/v6.5.5-322-g9327d0db36be/testrun/20257175/suite/kunit/test/req_alloc/details/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/config
Steps to reproduce:
# To install tuxrun to your home directory at ~/.local/bin:
# pip3 install -U --user tuxrun==0.49.2
#
# Or install a deb/rpm depending on the running distribution
# See https://tuxmake.org/install-deb/ or
# https://tuxmake.org/install-rpm/
#
# See https://tuxrun.org/ for complete documentation.
Link to reproducer,
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/tuxmake_reproducer.sh
or
tuxrun --runtime podman --device qemu-armv7 --boot-args rw --kernel
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/zImage
--modules https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/modules.tar.xz
--rootfs https://storage.tuxboot.com/debian/bookworm/armhf/rootfs.ext4.xz
--parameters SKIPFILE=skipfile-lkft.yaml --image
docker.io/linaro/tuxrun-dispatcher:v0.49.2 --tests kunit --timeouts
boot=30
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.5 000/321] 6.5.6-rc1 review
2023-10-05 5:55 ` [PATCH 6.5 000/321] 6.5.6-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-10-05 14:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2023-10-05 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Jinjie Ruan, stable, patches, linux-kernel,
torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor,
Netdev, kunit-dev, Eric Dumazet, chuck.lever
It'd probably make sense to run the path to the test that's failing
thru get_maintainer and throw the right people on the CC. Adding Chuck.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 11:25:24 +0530 Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.5.6 release.
> > There are 321 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.5.6-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.5.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> While running kunit testing on qemu-armv7 following test failures noticed
> on stable rc 6.5.6-rc1.
>
> # req_destroy works: EXPECTATION FAILED at net/handshake/handshake-test.c:477
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> Test log:
> ----------
> <6>[ 1351.687335] KTAP version 1
> <6>[ 1351.688300] # Subtest: Handshake API tests
> <6>[ 1351.688760] 1..11
> <6>[ 1351.689362] KTAP version 1
> <6>[ 1351.689985] # Subtest: req_alloc API fuzzing
> <6>[ 1351.694360] ok 1 handshake_req_alloc NULL proto
> <6>[ 1351.705855] ok 2 handshake_req_alloc CLASS_NONE
> <6>[ 1351.710878] ok 3 handshake_req_alloc CLASS_MAX
> <6>[ 1351.715435] ok 4 handshake_req_alloc no callbacks
> <6>[ 1351.722026] ok 5 handshake_req_alloc no done callback
> <6>[ 1351.726579] ok 6 handshake_req_alloc excessive privsize
> <6>[ 1351.732397] ok 7 handshake_req_alloc all good
> <6>[ 1351.732934] # req_alloc API fuzzing: pass:7 fail:0 skip:0 total:7
> <6>[ 1351.733586] ok 1 req_alloc API fuzzing
> <6>[ 1351.741251] ok 2 req_submit NULL req arg
> <6>[ 1351.745979] ok 3 req_submit NULL sock arg
> <6>[ 1351.753307] ok 4 req_submit NULL sock->file
> <6>[ 1351.763090] ok 5 req_lookup works
> <6>[ 1351.770057] ok 6 req_submit max pending
> <6>[ 1351.774878] ok 7 req_submit multiple
> <6>[ 1351.782411] ok 8 req_cancel before accept
> <6>[ 1351.787423] ok 9 req_cancel after accept
> <6>[ 1351.795660] ok 10 req_cancel after done
> <3>[ 1351.799741] # req_destroy works: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> net/handshake/handshake-test.c:477
> <3>[ 1351.799741] Expected handshake_req_destroy_test == req, but
> <3>[ 1351.799741] handshake_req_destroy_test == 00000000
> <3>[ 1351.799741] req == cae22700
> <6>[ 1351.803368] not ok 11 req_destroy works
> <6>[ 1351.804539] # Handshake API tests: pass:10 fail:1 skip:0 total:11
> <6>[ 1351.805460] # Totals: pass:16 fail:1 skip:0 total:17
> <6>[ 1351.806276] not ok 95 Handshake API tests
>
> Links:
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.5.y/build/v6.5.5-322-g9327d0db36be/testrun/20257175/suite/kunit/test/req_alloc/log
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.5.y/build/v6.5.5-322-g9327d0db36be/testrun/20257175/suite/kunit/test/req_alloc/details/
> - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/
> - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/config
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> # To install tuxrun to your home directory at ~/.local/bin:
> # pip3 install -U --user tuxrun==0.49.2
> #
> # Or install a deb/rpm depending on the running distribution
> # See https://tuxmake.org/install-deb/ or
> # https://tuxmake.org/install-rpm/
> #
> # See https://tuxrun.org/ for complete documentation.
> Link to reproducer,
> https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/tuxmake_reproducer.sh
>
> or
>
> tuxrun --runtime podman --device qemu-armv7 --boot-args rw --kernel
> https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/zImage
> --modules https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2WJGlCUgDzR8asQbd2BxMssFcEc/modules.tar.xz
> --rootfs https://storage.tuxboot.com/debian/bookworm/armhf/rootfs.ext4.xz
> --parameters SKIPFILE=skipfile-lkft.yaml --image
> docker.io/linaro/tuxrun-dispatcher:v0.49.2 --tests kunit --timeouts
> boot=30
>
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-05 14:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20231004175229.211487444@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-05 5:55 ` [PATCH 6.5 000/321] 6.5.6-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-05 14:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).