From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, s-vadapalli@ti.com,
srk@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com, p-varis@ti.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 2/4] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add mqprio qdisc offload in channel mode
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 12:01:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231005090141.bjya2lfarcs3ujhb@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230927072741.21221-3-rogerq@kernel.org>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:27:39AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c
> index f91137d8e73b..991221d8f148 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c
> @@ -16,10 +16,19 @@
> #include "cpsw_ale.h"
>
> #define AM65_CPSW_REG_CTL 0x004
> +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_TX_PRI_MAP 0x018
> +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_RX_PRI_MAP 0x020
> +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_FIFO_STATUS 0x050
> +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_PRI_CIR(pri) (0x140 + 4 * (pri))
> +#define AM65_CPSW_P0_REG_PRI_EIR(pri) (0x160 + 4 * (pri))
> +
> #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_CTL 0x004
> +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP 0x018
> +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_RX_PRI_MAP 0x020
> #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_FIFO_STATUS 0x050
> #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_EST_CTL 0x060
> #define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_CIR(pri) (0x140 + 4 * (pri))
> +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_PRI_EIR(pri) (0x160 + 4 * (pri))
>
> /* AM65_CPSW_REG_CTL register fields */
> #define AM65_CPSW_CTL_EST_EN BIT(18)
> @@ -50,12 +59,18 @@
> #define AM65_CPSW_FETCH_ALLOW_MSK GENMASK(7, 0)
> #define AM65_CPSW_FETCH_ALLOW_MAX AM65_CPSW_FETCH_ALLOW_MSK
>
> +#define TO_MBPS(x) ((x) * 8 / 1000000)
> +
> enum timer_act {
> TACT_PROG, /* need program timer */
> TACT_NEED_STOP, /* need stop first */
> TACT_SKIP_PROG, /* just buffer can be updated */
> };
>
> +/* number of priority queues per port FIFO */
> +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_FIFO_PRIO_NUM 8
> +#define AM65_CPSW_PN_TX_PRI_MAP_DEFAULT 0x76543210
> +static void am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> + struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> + struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> + struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
> +
> + p_mqprio->shaper_en = false;
> + p_mqprio->max_rate_total = 0;
> +
> + am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_reset(port);
> + netdev_reset_tc(ndev);
> + netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, common->tx_ch_num);
If this never gets changed from the value set by am65_cpsw_nuss_ndo_slave_open(),
then there is no reason to call netif_set_real_num_tx_queues() here.
> +
> + /* Reset all Queue priorities to 0 */
> + writel(0, port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);
To 0 or to AM65_CPSW_PN_TX_PRI_MAP_DEFAULT (which is now unused)?
Also, do I understand correctly that immediately after boot, TX_PRI_MAP
will have a different value than after the deletion of the mqprio root qdisc
(if AM65_CPSW_PN_TX_PRI_MAP_DEFAULT represents the hardware default value)?
The behavior needs to be identical in the 2 cases, since both represent
"no mqprio offload".
> +}
> +
> +static int am65_cpsw_setup_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
> +{
> + struct am65_cpsw_port *port = am65_ndev_to_port(ndev);
> + struct am65_cpsw_mqprio *p_mqprio = &port->qos.mqprio;
> + struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload *mqprio = type_data;
> + struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
> + struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt = &mqprio->qopt;
> + int tc, offset, count, ret, prio;
> + u8 num_tc = qopt->num_tc;
> + u32 tx_prio_map = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + memcpy(&p_mqprio->mqprio_hw, mqprio, sizeof(*mqprio));
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(common->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(common->dev);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (!num_tc) {
> + am65_cpsw_reset_tc_mqprio(ndev);
> + goto exit_put;
> + }
> +
> + ret = am65_cpsw_mqprio_verify_shaper(port, mqprio);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit_put;
At "exit_put" we have "return 0" and this discards the value of "ret".
> +
> + netdev_set_num_tc(ndev, num_tc);
> +
> + /* Multiple Linux priorities can map to a Traffic Class
> + * A Traffic Class can have multiple contiguous Queues,
> + * Queues get mapped to Channels (thread_id),
> + * if not VLAN tagged, thread_id is used as packet_priority
> + * if VLAN tagged. VLAN priority is used as packet_priorit
> + * packet_priority gets mapped to header_priority in p0_rx_pri_map,
> + * header_priority gets mapped to switch_priority in pn_tx_pri_map.
> + * As p0_rx_pri_map is left at defaults (0x76543210), we can
> + * assume that Queue_n gets mapped to header_priority_n. We can then
> + * set the switch priority in pn_tx_pri_map.
> + */
> +
> + for (tc = 0; tc < num_tc; tc++) {
> + prio = tc;
> +
> + /* For simplicity we assign the same priority (TCn) to
> + * all queues of a Traffic Class.
> + */
> + for (i = qopt->offset[tc]; i < qopt->offset[tc] + qopt->count[tc]; i++)
> + tx_prio_map |= prio << (4 * i);
> +
> + count = qopt->count[tc];
> + offset = qopt->offset[tc];
> + netdev_set_tc_queue(ndev, tc, count, offset);
> + }
I think this is okay.
> +
> + writel(tx_prio_map,
> + port->port_base + AM65_CPSW_PN_REG_TX_PRI_MAP);
Nit: This can be written on a single line.
> +
> + am65_cpsw_tx_pn_shaper_apply(port);
> +
> +exit_put:
> + pm_runtime_put(common->dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int am65_cpsw_qos_ndo_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> void *type_data)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 7:27 [PATCH v5 net-next 0/4] net: ethernet: am65-cpsw: Add mqprio, frame pre-emption & coalescing Roger Quadros
2023-09-27 7:27 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 1/4] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Move code to avoid forward declaration Roger Quadros
2023-09-27 7:27 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 2/4] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add mqprio qdisc offload in channel mode Roger Quadros
2023-10-01 6:55 ` Simon Horman
2023-10-06 12:28 ` Roger Quadros
2023-10-05 9:01 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2023-10-06 12:29 ` Roger Quadros
2023-09-27 7:27 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 3/4] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-qos: Add Frame Preemption MAC Merge support Roger Quadros
2023-10-05 7:57 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-10-06 12:30 ` Roger Quadros
2023-10-05 9:29 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-10-06 12:32 ` Roger Quadros
2023-09-27 7:27 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 4/4] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add sw tx/rx irq coalescing based on hrtimers Roger Quadros
2023-10-01 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 0/4] net: ethernet: am65-cpsw: Add mqprio, frame pre-emption & coalescing Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231005090141.bjya2lfarcs3ujhb@skbuf \
--to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p-varis@ti.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).