From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B631CA9A for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xjq91hMU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E078AC433C8; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:55:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696604137; bh=escjTaAkihSGCwsnxPhJNWcVLi3MOtJXB2WfVZLU/AI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xjq91hMUaSUj8yHtoYoNfxZsXwJMtqvlTupffCdR2YqZrTI02mHmFywx6WT36rqAR XrYQ8/ALEPGkvO0a61fV+WztHkKKKl+zgJrQxl7eIWRNgTE5c7XvFB/QQXK5jt0QYM nf075SJZMFtTd4ckmPb9JIU+0EifqUWsTni/VUCtI2wT5a0NEGIPm993UgSnbD+Dzg z9lfKhDs5GWxmz0AbJjzYDxDaMdW4ERn/eeRZPcH3Qr2QwXlBwAXN4otiY4K4TJ/DK uEDxEvs+/GxE+LHO3vPhhAiTXbqmENV3cFz4on9f3Ry1BnyTQ7EcskuZQr5UUDa0c5 1XFU4+/wjFSAg== Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 07:55:36 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jiri Pirko Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, corbet@lwn.net, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] dpll: spec: add support for pin-dpll signal phase offset/adjust Message-ID: <20231006075536.3b21582e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231006114101.1608796-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com> <20231006114101.1608796-3-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:30:00 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: > >+version: 2 > > I'm confused. Didn't you say you'll remove this? If not, my question > from v1 still stands. Perhaps we should dis-allow setting version in non-genetlink-legacy specs? I thought it may be a useful thing to someone, at some point, but so far the scoreboard is: legit uses: 0, confused uses: 1 :S Thoughts?