Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers

FUJITA Tomonori
2023-10-07T03:26:14Z

On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 19:37:15 -0400
Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 10:47 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
>> > So I think that merging the patchset through a single tree is easier;
>> > netdev or rust.
>> >
>> > Miguel, how do you prefer to merge the patchset?
>>
>> What are the merge conflicts looking like? What has happened in the
>> past? [...]
>
> Miguel has said before that if subsystems are comfortable bringing
> rust through their trees then they are welcome to do so, which helps
> get a better idea of how everything works together. If you prefer not
> to, it can come through rust-next with no problem.

It makes sense because these bindings are maintained by subsystems.

I'll send patches with 'net-next' tag in the next round.