From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7627450D4 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 22:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ocWR7rKU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B7EDC433C8; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 22:25:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696631118; bh=XBLOBl7PBjoMm67FO0A3a8OPI29qL334wBMnsiJUWZk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ocWR7rKUHrsVOT6QphT4ZhMtJwXiwBcJYrfk2va6yizhti3t11SpxMIgztlNVd3PW vFiVcTJ/hqe3gIMyRw9Mw8n1Xo32RRb1eIL793tVbzr6I5Gl84NCWcNIhhziY9au76 OUQh9wajirgEgr35rFektSiEYFC3b/L250KMjv02XuYABso3gQpatgaAjWhkgw+BZ9 yrlAewcHc2eYPlDFtNuUdMYv5699gLkMGWnKh03c59yKqtyK+vMz7V9lf57QaW1vAh q2eGJnvDzHcEEF8B3NtUIKS2Dyy6mAa4n/2jM87anPYwDA9iRRUo2UrAyyIbkm4g4M YBQ3R33mNz7Yg== Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 15:25:16 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jamal Hadi Salim Cc: Jiri Pirko , Victor Nogueira , xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, mleitner@redhat.com, vladbu@nvidia.com, simon.horman@corigine.com, pctammela@mojatatu.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@mojatatu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] net/sched: Introduce tc block ports tracking and use Message-ID: <20231006152516.5ff2aeca@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231005184228.467845-1-victor@mojatatu.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 15:06:45 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > > I don't understand the need for configuration less here. You don't have > > it for the rest of the actions. Why this is special? +1, FWIW > It is not needed really. Think of an L2 switch - the broadcast action > is to send to all ports but self. We do have an implementation of an L2 switch already, what's the use case which necessitates this new action / functionality?