netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 5/5] ice: Document tx_scheduling_layers parameter
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 17:35:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231007153558.GE831234@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006110212.96305-6-mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 07:02:12AM -0400, Mateusz Polchlopek wrote:
> From: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>
> 
> New driver specific parameter 'tx_scheduling_layers' was introduced.
> Describe parameter in the documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>

Hi,

I'm not expert here,
but this seems to cause a splat when building documentation.

.../ice.rst:70: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
.../ice.rst:25: WARNING: Error parsing content block for the "list-table" directive: uniform two-level bullet list expected, but row 2 does not contain the same number of items as row 1 (3 vs 4).

.. list-table:: Driver-specific parameters implemented
   :widths: 5 5 5 85

   * - Name
     - Type
     - Mode
     - Description
   * - ``tx_scheduling_layers``
     - u8
     - permanent
       The ice hardware uses hierarchical scheduling for Tx with a fixed
       number of layers in the scheduling tree. Root node is representing a
       port, while all the leaves represents the queues. This way of
       configuring Tx scheduler allows features like DCB or devlink-rate
       (documented below) for fine-grained configuration how much BW is given
       to any given queue or group of queues, as scheduling parameters can be
       configured at any given layer of the tree. By default 9-layer tree
       topology was deemed best for most workloads, as it gives optimal
       performance to configurability ratio. However for some specific cases,
       this might not be the case. A great example would be sending traffic to
       queues that is not a multiple of 8. Since in 9-layer topology maximum
       number of children is limited to 8, the 9th queue has a different parent
       than the rest, and it's given more BW credits. This causes a problem
       when the system is sending traffic to 9 queues:

       | tx_queue_0_packets: 24163396
       | tx_queue_1_packets: 24164623
       | tx_queue_2_packets: 24163188
       | tx_queue_3_packets: 24163701
       | tx_queue_4_packets: 24163683
       | tx_queue_5_packets: 24164668
       | tx_queue_6_packets: 23327200
       | tx_queue_7_packets: 24163853
       | tx_queue_8_packets: 91101417 < Too much traffic is sent to 9th

       Sometimes this might be a big concern, so the idea is to empower the
       user to switch to 5-layer topology, enabling performance gains but
       sacrificing configurability for features like DCB and devlink-rate.

       This parameter gives user flexibility to choose the 5-layer transmit
       scheduler topology. After switching parameter reboot is required for
       the feature to start working.

       User could choose 9 (the default) or 5 as a value of parameter, e.g.:
       $ devlink dev param set pci/0000:16:00.0 name tx_scheduling_layers
         value 5 cmode permanent

       And verify that value has been set:
       $ devlink dev param show pci/0000:16:00.0 name tx_scheduling_layers

      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-07 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-06 11:02 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/5] ice: Support 5 layer Tx scheduler topology Mateusz Polchlopek
2023-10-06 11:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 1/5] ice: Support 5 layer topology Mateusz Polchlopek
2023-10-06 11:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 2/5] ice: Adjust the VSI/Aggregator layers Mateusz Polchlopek
2023-10-06 11:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 3/5] ice: Enable switching default Tx scheduler topology Mateusz Polchlopek
2023-10-06 11:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 4/5] ice: Add tx_scheduling_layers devlink param Mateusz Polchlopek
2023-10-06 11:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 5/5] ice: Document tx_scheduling_layers parameter Mateusz Polchlopek
2023-10-07 15:35   ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231007153558.GE831234@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wilczynski@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).