From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA1F4377 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 01:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bjnXfl4q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6E3DC433C8; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 01:09:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696900179; bh=rpZwfgLhvy5NqjoH11+XB5hus1b0cemlPwEivuy1gFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bjnXfl4qyuPsS3baHqQuOCAT9FK00axcKnBdFMKqr5qve0gkvhIWLMx8mu/1iw7BN qfday0BuLRKe5KHd3HgjQ+sWFY4KKatOiBh6GVZkeAzcdHUEKU8Z1UudPoSJs8He1+ hQ9avKm296g5+eZr2rFN/3O9RVsguAzz/q6COyj7kuREWtBmwr8BqJWsIp0X0PByrW uQthIrcDvxGkDY+Y0FSxn0j3nL6T8rDSjjrDXRwC/gHOQ1aH3DR6fe8r78IfW4AtpQ LytbcKENjMPJ5sz/ZKsoKamVp1gWxob3/ETRSCItZNG7L3AeNXWFIP4X15RKQd5NJ3 Rtsy8TBg4kXmQ== Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 18:09:37 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Wander Lairson Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: Use SMP threads for backlog NAPI (or optional). Message-ID: <20231009180937.2afdc4c1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20231007155957.aPo0ImuG@linutronix.de> References: <20230929162121.1822900-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20231004154609.6007f1a0@kernel.org> <20231007155957.aPo0ImuG@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 17:59:57 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Apologies if I misunderstood. You said to make it optional which I did > with the static key in the second patch of this series. The first patch > is indeed not what we talked about I just to show what it would look > like now that there is no "delay" for backlog-NAPI on the local CPU. > > If the optional part is okay then I can repost only that patch against > current net-next. Do we have reason to believe nobody uses RPS?