netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Dichtel  <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, pablo@netfilter.org,
	jiri@resnulli.us, mkubecek@suse.cz, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com,
	Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] netlink: add variable-length / auto integers
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:45:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231011094550.7837d43a@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30be757c7a0bbe50b37e9f2e6f93c8cf4219bbc1.camel@sipsolutions.net>

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:01:49 +0200
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 08:52 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> > > > > Even for arches which don't have good unaligned access - I'd think
> > > > > that access aligned to 4B *is* pretty efficient, and that's all
> > > > > we need. Plus kernel deals with unaligned input. Why can't user space?    
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm. I have a vague recollection that it was related to just not doing
> > > > it - the kernel will do get_unaligned() or similar, but userspace if it
> > > > just accesses it might take a trap on some architectures?
> > > > 
> > > > But I can't find any record of this in public discussions, so ...    
> > > If I remember well, at this time, we had some (old) architectures that triggered
> > > traps (in kernel) when a 64-bit field was accessed and unaligned. Maybe a mix
> > > between 64-bit kernel / 32-bit userspace, I don't remember exactly. The goal was
> > > to align u64 fields on 8 bytes.  
> > 
> > Reading the discussions I think we can chalk the alignment up 
> > to "old way of doing things". Discussion was about stats64, 
> > if someone wants to access stats directly in the message then yes, 
> > they care a lot about alignment.
> > 
> > Today we try to steer people towards attr-per-field, rather than
> > dumping structs. Instead of doing:
> > 
> > 	struct stats *stats = nla_data(attr);
> > 	print("A: %llu", stats->a);
> > 
> > We will do:
> > 
> > 	print("A: %llu", nla_get_u64(attrs[NLA_BLA_STAT_A]));  
> 
> Well, yes, although the "struct stats" part _still_ even exists in the
> kernel, we never fixed that with the nla_put_u64_64bit() stuff, that was
> only for something that does
> 
> 	print("A: %" PRIu64, *(uint64_t *)nla_data(attrs[NLA_BLA_STAT_A]));
> 
> > Assuming nla_get_u64() is unalign-ready the problem doesn't exist.  
> 
> Depends on the library, but at least for libnl that's true since ever.
> Same for libmnl and libnl-tiny. So I guess it only ever hit hand-coded
> implementations.

Quick check of iproute2 shows places where stats are directly
mapped without accessors. One example is print_mpls_stats().

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-11 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-11  0:33 [RFC] netlink: add variable-length / auto integers Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 13:11 ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-11 14:03   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2023-10-11 15:52     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 16:01       ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-11 16:45         ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-10-12  9:26           ` David Laight
2023-10-12  6:47       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2023-10-11 16:08   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 16:16     ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-11 16:19       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 13:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 16:16   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 16:21     ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-11 16:34       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 16:37         ` Johannes Berg
2023-10-11 17:01     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-11 20:21       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231011094550.7837d43a@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=thaller@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).