From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0233A807 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qs9C+NF0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27DAAC433C7; Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:25:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697156710; bh=vYkp6S4mPHu+UOe0+k56WulsJR2DvdGtmQXagstNZWM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qs9C+NF0wHnG3RoCkga8h1Ie6rkHFdgrs9DYr0AXo2276uGFB/iI0MrnzolpsHp6w DcDITQaRxHyiLzKSJiHR9xWZPB73KE2toKZH7xII4J/++AeOn+3U6NO1oRIa/pXkw6 VxuT6/5lsR9vnJYHWUdAmkgcYLbSpkjZqlTLAnP4cgItEBb6dN8GBLK1mYnfgRr5cr wg6biH39YQkTLNrn2+EnL0EmhNtrS1L3m0lZRu8WY5kHyzkoEkNUsVO6IsH1r0u/Ft T/RFyXLhGdqU4Nn0/jG1lrRuI3IcnVMgWEcoZLNmf6lEnxNhGQp9bDXPeFfTXyeSGD IqDmCCxH5hggg== Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:25:09 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jiri Pirko Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net Subject: Re: [patch net-next 02/10] tools: ynl-gen: introduce support for bitfield32 attribute type Message-ID: <20231012172509.6750c116@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231010110828.200709-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20231010110828.200709-3-jiri@resnulli.us> <20231010115804.761486f1@kernel.org> <20231011095236.5fdca6e2@kernel.org> <20231011112537.2962c8be@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 11:28:40 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: >> all in all there aren't very many new uses. So I think we should >> put it in legacy for now. Maybe somehow mark it as being there due >> to limited applicability rather than being "bad"? > > I think it is odd, but if you insists, sure. Your the boss. Just to be clear here - we're talking about what goes into which level of compatibility within YNL. So yes, I wrote YNL, I'd prefer to retain the ability to make some decisions about it :(