From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Ethernet issue on imx6
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:34:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231012193410.3d1812cf@xps-13> (raw)
Hello,
I've been scratching my foreheads for weeks on a strange imx6
network issue, I need help to go further, as I feel a bit clueless now.
Here is my setup :
- Custom imx6q board
- Bootloader: U-Boot 2017.11 (also tried with a 2016.03)
- Kernel : 4.14(.69,.146,.322), v5.10 and v6.5 with the same behavior
- The MAC (fec driver) is connected to a Micrel 9031 PHY
- The PHY is connected to the link partner through an industrial cable
- Testing 100BASE-T (link is stable)
The RGMII-ID timings are probably not totally optimal but offer rather
good performance. In UDP with iperf3:
* Downlink (host to the board) runs at full speed with 0% drop
* Uplink (board to host) runs at full speed with <1% drop
However, if I ever try to limit the bandwidth in uplink (only), the drop
rate rises significantly, up to 30%:
//192.168.1.1 is my host, so the below lines are from the board:
# iperf3 -c 192.168.1.1 -u -b100M
[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 113 MBytes 94.6 Mbits/sec 0.044 ms 467/82603 (0.57%) receiver
# iperf3 -c 192.168.1.1 -u -b90M
[ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 90.5 MBytes 75.6 Mbits/sec 0.146 ms 12163/77688 (16%) receiver
# iperf3 -c 192.168.1.1 -u -b80M
[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 66.4 MBytes 55.5 Mbits/sec 0.162 ms 20937/69055 (30%) receiver
One direct consequence, I believe, is that tcp transfers quickly stall
or run at an insanely low speed (~40kiB/s).
I've tried to disable all the hardware offloading reported by ethtool
with no additional success.
Last but not least, I observe another very strange behavior: when I
perform an uplink transfer at a "reduced" speed (80Mbps or below), as
said above, I observe a ~30% drop rate. But if I run a full speed UDP
transfer in downlink at the same time, the drop rate lowers to ~3-4%.
See below, this is an iperf server on my host receiving UDP traffic from
my board. After 5 seconds I start a full speed UDP transfer from the
host to the board:
[ 5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5201 connected to 192.168.1.2 port 57216
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 6.29 MBytes 52.7 Mbits/sec 0.152 ms 2065/6617 (31%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 6.50 MBytes 54.6 Mbits/sec 0.118 ms 2199/6908 (32%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 6.64 MBytes 55.7 Mbits/sec 0.123 ms 2099/6904 (30%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 6.58 MBytes 55.2 Mbits/sec 0.091 ms 2141/6905 (31%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 6.59 MBytes 55.3 Mbits/sec 0.092 ms 2134/6907 (31%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 8.36 MBytes 70.1 Mbits/sec 0.088 ms 853/6904 (12%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 9.14 MBytes 76.7 Mbits/sec 0.085 ms 281/6901 (4.1%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.19 MBytes 77.1 Mbits/sec 0.147 ms 255/6911 (3.7%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.22 MBytes 77.3 Mbits/sec 0.160 ms 233/6907 (3.4%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 9.25 MBytes 77.6 Mbits/sec 0.129 ms 211/6906 (3.1%)
[ 5] 10.00-10.04 sec 392 KBytes 76.9 Mbits/sec 0.113 ms 11/288 (3.8%)
If the downlink transfer is not at full speed, I don't observe any
difference.
I've commented out the runtime_pm callbacks in the fec driver, but
nothing changed.
Any hint or idea will be highly appreciated!
Thanks a lot,
Miquèl
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 17:34 Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-10-12 19:39 ` Ethernet issue on imx6 Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-13 8:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-13 10:16 ` Wei Fang
2023-10-16 11:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-16 13:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-16 15:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-16 15:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-16 19:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-10-16 21:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-17 11:19 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-12 20:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-12 22:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-13 8:27 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-13 15:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-27 20:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-11-17 15:09 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-16 8:48 ` Alexander Stein
2023-10-16 13:31 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-16 14:41 ` Alexander Stein
2023-10-17 10:49 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-18 9:08 ` Alexander Stein
2023-10-27 20:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-13 8:50 ` James Chapman
2023-10-13 10:37 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-13 11:54 ` James Chapman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231012193410.3d1812cf@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).