From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76F818623 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 08:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FI7rEVu0" Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629BAB4 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 01:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-32d849cc152so4031161f8f.1 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 01:14:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697444048; x=1698048848; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=oQjpvg7MGAmM9iA2NCznSunlkzHKe6ycndsouHEmzpk=; b=FI7rEVu0d+bcprOnEwUUMLepoKMOAjGOP1ycO2fnjGE5KR+amB55erC0onsSvWp9RZ h0E3TeyKZiNeA4+mwMgfU4QDRZQSWL12o1CTpt4KkG0hwobNEtPktwWH2f7ZnKX4BCQj hrd9dc6H1tqHpbMJ6sPe65mVEnpX17biggHeISbUJCxijhurPyUpGwsuGPlU43Yig1iZ 3yInYejnUbXJA0QYgVzJKq2TWQpAuHzHAxIQGwD94rV5HD300tQKFejMPbJZ2w2TSYJO 8P7NWj8kPePKfHn/9SxGYQje+JDjyD1fhnXjE9Luxc7fvuKsfW7dURuMELW2DjIIkvBt cv/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697444048; x=1698048848; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oQjpvg7MGAmM9iA2NCznSunlkzHKe6ycndsouHEmzpk=; b=jd8SwgLiARekgJhAImajSReQvyCHmoJaPuRVhOeNnYLlvzEi2N9td6Irkm4OTBKnxV 1O5Z1lKSTLzXhrRP3Z1BvvvSmuVygcZk23d5E72hQS8e/d+zzIdpG/wZraPmN0tv7YYS MaXJYZShqagGECOvmtUwxTLQbpIwAoTvSyjGBgfbV5CK3GRpjnIOcu73ocz0L2lUyfqd pBni9+bynn1NBGmAtqDs6WDFKKEn23AQjAiHyYxg92BkEyJlTbjLnDLYk0D5TldBHJj6 3ykL+qdqUlp0G/CGRy1YP784HUlEyIfqrOuJihrP+vrTFJ0D4Q1WtPFiqKdLpC3fZ/h2 1OFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxr2bSKf9iuZC5ST/8Jizn5kPJYceUnJdS2vSdH0JMbp+VA+Ybf q/tp+WGcgB6wLVTne+sXxz8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHJ1KBmQhTTq9FucQdsbJI/NYYxMdPPS/M5zXZ3oFtQ7bspxLFQzYZRQa86eK5qXpsCLWebeA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1189:b0:321:6936:c217 with SMTP id g9-20020a056000118900b003216936c217mr26853069wrx.14.1697444047600; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 01:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xmarquiegui-HP-ZBook-15-G6.internal.ainguraiiot.com (210.212-55-6.static.clientes.euskaltel.es. [212.55.6.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t11-20020a5d534b000000b003232380ffd5sm26703515wrv.106.2023.10.16.01.14.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Oct 2023 01:14:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Xabier Marquiegui To: kuba@kernel.org Cc: chrony-dev@chrony.tuxfamily.org, davem@davemloft.net, horms@kernel.org, jstultz@google.com, mlichvar@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ntp-lists@mattcorallo.com, reibax@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, rrameshbabu@nvidia.com, shuah@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, vinicius.gomes@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/6] ptp: add debugfs interface to see applied channel masks Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 10:14:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20231016081404.1647363-1-reibax@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20231012163733.1f61a56d@kernel.org> References: <20231012163733.1f61a56d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Jakub Kicinski said: > The netdevsim driver which is supposed to be used for uAPI selftests > now supports PHCs. Maybe we can extend it and build a proper-er test? > > Whether we'd then want to move the debugfs entries onto netdevsim > or leave them where you have then now is another question.. That is an interesting idea. Thank you Jakub. I will start looking onto it at whatever pace my other duties allow me to give it some thought. One challenge I anticipate encountering is that even if netdevsim has PHC support via the PTP mock implementation, we will probably have to think about how to simulate external timestamp events.