From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7743D99D for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="M93MFRgo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E005CC43395; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:09:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697533766; bh=0J00yBt6B+0GI95PaNrYuW82ColdTJxLKzN75HBOfTI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M93MFRgowGo0xLvNH6mhY5IHz2AkL7yxlNmuE7f59h0T89aSwLaRh0fll8U2VvMMq uYt3SmBdvdMxZKlHcPYonQHU/Lk7OQTer9zwjggGGYnijGlTHRRzgHKzu3ikmbjsuc igoHi5ZtXAC/Dz1s0Irue5hYTRz+YBVW+/Otljrg7SV4207jGrwNcvu0rdLTOEkncr OnAroEb0QT8ruQQ007OAEJQe05hskjvquJ1X7X2Llt7KGT/GkvGWmbBFJEz466qBQE apkoWKiptypCbWpjR0rEg26YlOozMELZfxcFeRAlJJ3v0VrBCmXpClLfXUIy1kMkdb 63Cmh90bJvkdw== Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:09:22 +0200 From: Simon Horman To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: Pravin B Shelar , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , dev@openvswitch.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] net: openvswitch: Use struct_size() Message-ID: <20231017090922.GQ1751252@kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:34:52AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it. > This is less verbose and more robust. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET > --- > v2: No change > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8be59c9e06fca8eff2f264abb4c2f74db0b19a9e.1696156198.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/ > > > This is IMHO more readable, even if not perfect. > > However (untested): > + new = kzalloc(size_add(struct_size(new, masks, size), > size_mul(sizeof(u64), size)), GFP_KERNEL); > looks completely unreadable to me. Thanks, this looks correct (and more readable) to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman