From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64B9838FB3; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nsU6RJai" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02222C433C8; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:18:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697534298; bh=qpijEw30yO3I2i4Uh+AxUics0aVeq+2voohpeVVfsx0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nsU6RJai9l9r7EFx/ChKj/t66QnpD+1dy54G4HcVFW82W+w/XQz6Wxid4JblCIvn6 W8PdyT2DOmlVHTCnx6+irc9SIUuVn5MD08vbq9FspQXJQ6zy4qZiDieAYNQTpjQL/y W1J6d3JGLUqmR+hwojyvnlZY5a0lrpILlr+st0jet7OCi8XU5FEuEI48Jedw5vXYOg enRIxZPxktpgBGJgZTTY3a7wdwDo7wXs9uD1j3x6/hsexQ4TPmpACkWaVQ5/8/Av1P PPV67ivkYVaitTao93HKq1EbE8f+twnBKBtNQ6WctaJNQDJ7dxBJxnLMHOrwAe1FG0 RZWNSBQVBYkGw== Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:18:14 +0200 From: Simon Horman To: Nandha Kumar Singaram Cc: Manish Chopra , GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com, Coiby Xu , Greg Kroah-Hartman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kumaran.4353@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: qlge: Replace the occurrences of (1< References: <20231015133558.GA5489@ubuntu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231015133558.GA5489@ubuntu> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 06:35:58AM -0700, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote: > Adhere to linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch.pl: > CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro > > Signed-off-by: Nandha Kumar Singaram Hi Nandha, I am assuming that checkpatch clean ups are acceptable, perhaps even desired, in staging. So this patch seems appropriate to me. I do, however, see a lot more potential uses of BIT() in qlge.h. Could you take a second look? ...