From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, petrm@nvidia.com, jiri@nvidia.com,
mlxsw@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 05/12] PCI: Add device-specific reset for NVIDIA Spectrum devices
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:00:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231017100022.GA10711@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017074257.3389177-6-idosch@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:42:50AM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The PCIe specification defines two methods to trigger a hot reset across
> a link: Bus reset and link disablement (r6.0.1, sec 7.1, sec 6.6.1). In
> the first method, the Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) bit in the Bridge
> Control Register of the Downstream Port is asserted for at least 1ms
> (r6.0.1, sec 7.5.1.3.13). In the second method, the Link Disable bit in
> the Link Control Register of the Downstream Port is asserted and then
> cleared to disable and enable the link (r6.0.1, sec 7.5.3.7).
>
> While the two methods are identical from the perspective of the
> Downstream device, they are different as far as the host is concerned.
> In the first method, the Link Training and Status State Machine (LTSSM)
> of the Downstream Port is expected to be in the Hot Reset state as long
> as the SBR bit is asserted. In the second method, the LTSSM of the
> Downstream Port is expected to be in the Disabled state as long as the
> Link Disable bit is asserted.
>
> This above difference is of importance because the specification
> requires the LTTSM to exit from the Hot Reset state to the Detect state
> within a 2ms timeout (r6.0.1, sec 4.2.7.11). NVIDIA Spectrum devices
> cannot guarantee it and a host enforcing such a behavior might fail to
> communicate with the device after issuing a Secondary Bus Reset.
How does that failure manifest itself exactly? Is the problem that
the Vendor ID register in config space is read too early and the
device doesn't like that?
It is possible to increase the d3cold_delay in struct pci_dev to
lengthen the delay until the Vendor ID is read. Have you considered
that instead of using the Link Disable method?
The following commit queued for v6.7 introduces a quirk for a 1 second
d3cold_delay, perhaps you can take advantage of it?
https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/c9260693aa0c
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-17 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 7:42 [RFC PATCH net-next 00/12] mlxsw: Add support for new reset flow Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 01/12] netdevsim: Block until all devices are released Ido Schimmel
2023-10-19 0:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 02/12] devlink: Hold a reference on parent device Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-17 8:11 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 9:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 03/12] devlink: Acquire device lock during reload Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 8:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 04/12] PCI: Add no PM reset quirk for NVIDIA Spectrum devices Ido Schimmel
2023-10-18 19:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-22 8:23 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 05/12] PCI: Add device-specific reset " Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 10:00 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2023-10-18 20:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-25 11:05 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 06/12] PCI: Add debug print for device ready delay Ido Schimmel
2023-10-18 19:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 07/12] mlxsw: Extend MRSR pack() function to support new commands Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 08/12] mlxsw: pci: Rename mlxsw_pci_sw_reset() Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 09/12] mlxsw: pci: Move software reset code to a separate function Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 10/12] mlxsw: pci: Add support for new reset flow Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 11/12] mlxsw: pci: Implement PCI reset handlers Ido Schimmel
2023-10-17 7:42 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 12/12] selftests: mlxsw: Add PCI reset test Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231017100022.GA10711@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).