From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B90941222
	for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:46:15 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none
Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211])
	by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8704DB;
	Tue, 17 Oct 2023 05:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
	id 4AE0367373; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:46:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:46:08 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
	Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>, arm-soc <soc@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] soc: renesas: select RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT from
 ARCH_R9A07G043
Message-ID: <20231017124608.GA4386@lst.de>
References: <20231016054755.915155-1-hch@lst.de> <20231016054755.915155-5-hch@lst.de> <20231016-pantyhose-tall-7565b6b20fb9@wendy> <20231016131745.GB26484@lst.de> <CAMuHMdXVZz=YWMAgzUzme-U3qxYeLdi66xw2CGubpesGy+ZjRw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netdev+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netdev+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXVZz=YWMAgzUzme-U3qxYeLdi66xw2CGubpesGy+ZjRw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	lindbergh.monkeyblade.net

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:44:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 3:17 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 01:52:57PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > +   select RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
> > > >     select ERRATA_ANDES if RISCV_SBI
> > > >     select ERRATA_ANDES_CMO if ERRATA_ANDES
> > >
> > > Since this Kconfig menu has changed a bit in linux-next, the selects
> > > are unconditional here, and ERRATA_ANDES_CMO will in turn select
> > > RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT.
> >
> > Oh, looks like another patch landed there in linux-next.  I had
> > waited for the previous one go go upstream in -rc6.  Not sure
> > how to best handle this conflict.
> 
> I think the easiest is to ask soc to apply this series?

I don't think pulling all the DMA bits into a random other tree
would be a good idea.   I can hand off the first few bits, but I'd
need a stable branch to pull in after that.  Which of the half a dozen
soc trees we have in linux-next is this anyway?