From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BDB95696 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 05:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rV/nO/ot" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F36CC433C7; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 05:13:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697605995; bh=Bvr83CzE9C2+DADG4mJzrwV2INtN9QlDi2Yweo0cJKE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rV/nO/otcyDhkrGAAzHl6+tkjEM979ioLxkETkIkvcbxCsd2VuGUjZA857uLYCCf6 pIshumTe3QV89pSAMGw119ehMBI9wMUx6pI4H6BhUBl4rNj+xFfo18LcRgPqq4s5QH vFHgyjZtcSQqQdZajBOTrluRZ+kek88T5TLSl0btC9rRtlYZvN9qbjTyVjJ/XNXF7Z q7fSp026phvgx9laBnXU5gk+ZoJ18PcX9Xem58K+3q6A0jVAZqIehu0YzwVUej8jaY LJIGnclH38BYXqIeh2eByAgDj4+59W1de/3+DZorsTLI9j0zjCzmohwmMuhvUAvZUd LZGK5JPkaX5tQ== Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 08:13:11 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Steffen Klassert Cc: Patrisious Haddad , Herbert Xu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Raed Salem , Saeed Mahameed Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm-next 5/9] net/mlx5e: Unify esw and normal IPsec status table creation/destruction Message-ID: <20231018051311.GE5392@unreal> References: <20231017121357.GC5392@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231017121357.GC5392@unreal> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 03:13:57PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:38:51AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:15:13PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > From: Patrisious Haddad > > > > > > Change normal IPsec flow to use the same creation/destruction functions > > > for status flow table as that of ESW, which first of all refines the > > > code to have less code duplication. > > > > > > And more importantly, the ESW status table handles IPsec syndrome > > > checks at steering by HW, which is more efficient than the previous > > > behaviour we had where it was copied to WQE meta data and checked > > > by the driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky > > > > This one does not apply to the ipsec-next tree. > > You are right, sorry about that. It is based on two net-next series > and I didn't expect such a fast response. > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231002083832.19746-1-leon@kernel.org/ - accepted. > 2. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231014171908.290428-16-saeed@kernel.org/#t - not accepted yet. > > Do you feel comfortable with the series/xfrm patches? If yes, Saeed can > resend the series directly to net-next once patch #2 is accepted. Steffen, second patch was accepted too. https://lore.kernel.org/all/169759322682.7564.2475141741118387188.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org This series applies cleanly to net-next now. Thanks > > Thanks >