From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/7] netfilter: conntrack: convert nf_conntrack_update to netfilter verdicts
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:51:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231018085118.10829-4-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018085118.10829-1-fw@strlen.de>
This function calls helpers that can return nf-verdicts, but then
those get converted to -1/0 as thats what the caller expects.
Theoretically NF_DROP could have an errno number set in the upper 24
bits of the return value. Or any of those helpers could return
NF_STOLEN, which would result in use-after-free.
This is fine as-is, the called functions don't do this yet.
But its better to avoid possible future problems if the upcoming
patchset to add NF_DROP_REASON() support gains further users, so remove
the 0/-1 translation from the picture and pass the verdicts down to
the caller.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c | 15 ++++----
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 124136b5a79a..2e5f3864d353 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -2169,11 +2169,11 @@ static int __nf_conntrack_update(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
dataoff = get_l4proto(skb, skb_network_offset(skb), l3num, &l4num);
if (dataoff <= 0)
- return -1;
+ return NF_DROP;
if (!nf_ct_get_tuple(skb, skb_network_offset(skb), dataoff, l3num,
l4num, net, &tuple))
- return -1;
+ return NF_DROP;
if (ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT) {
memcpy(tuple.src.u3.all,
@@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ static int __nf_conntrack_update(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
h = nf_conntrack_find_get(net, nf_ct_zone(ct), &tuple);
if (!h)
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
/* Store status bits of the conntrack that is clashing to re-do NAT
* mangling according to what it has been done already to this packet.
@@ -2206,19 +2206,25 @@ static int __nf_conntrack_update(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
nat_hook = rcu_dereference(nf_nat_hook);
if (!nat_hook)
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
- if (status & IPS_SRC_NAT &&
- nat_hook->manip_pkt(skb, ct, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC,
- IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) == NF_DROP)
- return -1;
+ if (status & IPS_SRC_NAT) {
+ unsigned int verdict = nat_hook->manip_pkt(skb, ct,
+ NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC,
+ IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL);
+ if (verdict != NF_ACCEPT)
+ return verdict;
+ }
- if (status & IPS_DST_NAT &&
- nat_hook->manip_pkt(skb, ct, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST,
- IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL) == NF_DROP)
- return -1;
+ if (status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
+ unsigned int verdict = nat_hook->manip_pkt(skb, ct,
+ NF_NAT_MANIP_DST,
+ IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL);
+ if (verdict != NF_ACCEPT)
+ return verdict;
+ }
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
}
/* This packet is coming from userspace via nf_queue, complete the packet
@@ -2233,14 +2239,14 @@ static int nf_confirm_cthelper(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
help = nfct_help(ct);
if (!help)
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
helper = rcu_dereference(help->helper);
if (!helper)
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
if (!(helper->flags & NF_CT_HELPER_F_USERSPACE))
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
switch (nf_ct_l3num(ct)) {
case NFPROTO_IPV4:
@@ -2255,42 +2261,44 @@ static int nf_confirm_cthelper(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
protoff = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr), &pnum,
&frag_off);
if (protoff < 0 || (frag_off & htons(~0x7)) != 0)
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
break;
}
#endif
default:
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
}
if (test_bit(IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT, &ct->status) &&
!nf_is_loopback_packet(skb)) {
if (!nf_ct_seq_adjust(skb, ct, ctinfo, protoff)) {
NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(nf_ct_net(ct), drop);
- return -1;
+ return NF_DROP;
}
}
/* We've seen it coming out the other side: confirm it */
- return nf_conntrack_confirm(skb) == NF_DROP ? - 1 : 0;
+ return nf_conntrack_confirm(skb);
}
static int nf_conntrack_update(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
struct nf_conn *ct;
- int err;
ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
if (!ct)
- return 0;
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct)) {
- err = __nf_conntrack_update(net, skb, ct, ctinfo);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
+ int ret = __nf_conntrack_update(net, skb, ct, ctinfo);
+
+ if (ret != NF_ACCEPT)
+ return ret;
ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
+ if (!ct)
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
}
return nf_confirm_cthelper(skb, ct, ctinfo);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
index 556bc902af00..171d1f52d3dd 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.c
@@ -228,19 +228,22 @@ find_dequeue_entry(struct nfqnl_instance *queue, unsigned int id)
static void nfqnl_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned int verdict)
{
const struct nf_ct_hook *ct_hook;
- int err;
if (verdict == NF_ACCEPT ||
verdict == NF_REPEAT ||
verdict == NF_STOP) {
rcu_read_lock();
ct_hook = rcu_dereference(nf_ct_hook);
- if (ct_hook) {
- err = ct_hook->update(entry->state.net, entry->skb);
- if (err < 0)
- verdict = NF_DROP;
- }
+ if (ct_hook)
+ verdict = ct_hook->update(entry->state.net, entry->skb);
rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ switch (verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) {
+ case NF_STOLEN:
+ nf_queue_entry_free(entry);
+ return;
+ }
+
}
nf_reinject(entry, verdict);
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-18 8:51 [PATCH net-next 0/7] netfilter updates for net-next Florian Westphal
2023-10-18 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] netfilter: xt_mangle: only check verdict part of return value Florian Westphal
2023-10-18 10:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-10-18 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] netfilter: nf_tables: mask out non-verdict bits when checking " Florian Westphal
2023-10-18 8:51 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2023-10-18 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] netfilter: nf_nat: " Florian Westphal
2023-10-18 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] netfilter: make nftables drops visible in net dropmonitor Florian Westphal
2023-10-18 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] netfilter: bridge: convert br_netfilter to NF_DROP_REASON Florian Westphal
2023-10-18 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] netfilter: nf_tables: de-constify set commit ops function argument Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231018085118.10829-4-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).